Simonsen P E, Dunyo S K
Danish Bilharziasis Laboratory, Charlottenlund, Denmark.
Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 1999 May-Jun;93(3):278-82. doi: 10.1016/s0035-9203(99)90022-6.
Three new and commercially available tools for diagnosis of Wuchereria bancrofti infections based on detection of specific circulating antigens were evaluated and compared in the same group of individuals from a highly endemic village in southern Ghana. The tests were: (1) the ICT card test for serum specimens; (2) the TropBio ELISA test for serum specimens; and (3) the TropBio ELISA test for filter-paper specimens. A high degree of positive/negative response similarity was observed for the 3 tests, and the sensitivity for detecting microfilaraemic cases was 100% for all tests. The antigen levels measured in the TropBio serum test and the TropBio filter-paper test were statistically significantly correlated. Among antigen-positive endemic individuals the antigen levels in these 2 tests furthermore showed a positive association with the microfilarial intensity, but a statistical significant correlation was seen only for the filter-paper version of the test. The results are promising for the use of the 3 tests as diagnostic tools in bancroftian filariasis.
在加纳南部一个高度流行的村庄的同一组个体中,对三种基于检测特定循环抗原的用于诊断班氏吴策线虫感染的新型商用工具进行了评估和比较。这些检测方法分别是:(1)针对血清标本的ICT卡检测;(2)针对血清标本的TropBio酶联免疫吸附检测;(3)针对滤纸标本的TropBio酶联免疫吸附检测。观察到这三种检测方法的阳性/阴性反应相似度很高,并且所有检测方法检测微丝蚴血症病例的灵敏度均为100%。TropBio血清检测和TropBio滤纸检测中测得的抗原水平具有统计学显著相关性。在抗原阳性的流行区个体中,这两种检测方法中的抗原水平还与微丝蚴强度呈正相关,但仅在滤纸版检测中观察到统计学显著相关性。这些结果表明这三种检测方法有望作为班氏丝虫病的诊断工具。