Suppr超能文献

直肠癌手术后的生活质量:我们仍然需要永久性结肠造口术吗?

Quality of life after surgery for rectal cancer: do we still need a permanent colostomy?

作者信息

Renner K, Rosen H R, Novi G, Hölbling N, Schiessel R

机构信息

Ludwig Boltzmann Research Institute for Surgical Oncology and Department of Surgery, Danube Hospital/SMZ-Ost, Vienna, Austria.

出版信息

Dis Colon Rectum. 1999 Sep;42(9):1160-7. doi: 10.1007/BF02238568.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

A permanent colostomy is a serious limitation of the quality of life. Besides cure of cancer, preservation of sphincter function is an important goal of surgery for rectal cancer.

METHODS

In a prospective study a concept offering every patient with rectal cancer either sphincter salvage or a "neosphincter" was investigated, and the impact of this strategy on oncologic results, sphincter function, and quality of life was analyzed.

RESULTS

From 1992 to 1997, 276 patients were accepted for the study. Two hundred sixty-one patients had elective surgery, and 15 patients had emergency surgery for their rectal tumors. The postoperative mortality rate was 4 percent. A radical resection (R0) was possible in 197 patients (75 percent). Anterior resection was the most common procedure (n = 87), and intersphincteric resection with coloanal anastomosis was the preferred method for low tumors (n = 65). Abdominoperineal resection was necessary in 15 cases. Thirteen patients had an immediate restoration of sphincter function by means of a dynamic graciloplasty, and 2 patients needed emergency abdominoperineal resection for bleeding. The follow-up was relatively short (median, 36.4 months) at the time of data analysis and showed a local recurrence rate of 8 percent. Although postoperative continence according to the Williams score revealed satisfactory results, subjective quality of life and the scale for specific symptoms showed a significantly worse outcome in patients with ultralow (coloanal) anastomoses compared with those with anterior resection.

CONCLUSIONS

We conclude that for elective curative surgery of rectal cancer, a permanent colostomy is not necessary provided all presently available techniques of sphincter salvage and restoration are applied. However, the patient has to be informed about possible side effects associated with surgical procedures such as coloanal anastomosis or neosphincter reconstruction, to avoid severe psychological difficulties.

摘要

引言

永久性结肠造口术严重限制生活质量。除了癌症治愈外,保留括约肌功能是直肠癌手术的一个重要目标。

方法

在一项前瞻性研究中,对一种为每位直肠癌患者提供括约肌保留或“新括约肌”的概念进行了研究,并分析了该策略对肿瘤学结果、括约肌功能和生活质量的影响。

结果

1992年至1997年,276例患者纳入研究。261例患者接受择期手术,15例患者因直肠肿瘤接受急诊手术。术后死亡率为4%。197例患者(75%)可行根治性切除(R0)。前切除术是最常见的手术方式(n = 87),低位肿瘤首选括约肌间切除并结肠肛管吻合术(n = 65)。15例患者需要行腹会阴联合切除术。13例患者通过动态股薄肌成形术立即恢复了括约肌功能,2例患者因出血需要急诊腹会阴联合切除术。在数据分析时随访时间相对较短(中位时间为36.4个月),局部复发率为8%。尽管根据威廉姆斯评分术后控便情况显示结果满意,但与前切除术患者相比,超低位(结肠肛管)吻合术患者的主观生活质量和特定症状量表结果明显更差。

结论

我们得出结论,对于直肠癌择期根治性手术,只要应用目前所有可用的括约肌保留和恢复技术,就无需进行永久性结肠造口术。然而,必须告知患者与手术操作(如结肠肛管吻合术或新括约肌重建)相关的可能副作用,以避免严重的心理困扰。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验