Mullins R J
Department of Surgery, Oregon Health Sciences University, School of Medicine, Portland 97201-3098, USA.
J Trauma. 1999 Sep;47(3 Suppl):S8-14. doi: 10.1097/00005373-199909001-00004.
The concept of a trauma system as public health policy has developed substantially during the 30 years since publication of Accidental Death and Disability: The Neglected Disease of Modern Society. The military experience with casualties established the public expectation that grievously injured citizens should be expected to survive if a system enables a team of experts to work smoothly together. The federal government has invested hundreds of millions of dollars in support of development of an infrastructure of emergency medical systems throughout the country, and trauma systems have benefited from timely prehospital care provided by trained professionals. State or regional metropolitan governments have initiated establishment of trauma systems as fusions of health care and the politics of health care policy. Trauma systems can be considered an experiment in health care policy because they have characteristics uncommon with other areas of medical practice. Hospitals have been categorized by means of outside review based on their capabilities to provide trauma care, which has led to designation, whereby individuals are transported to trauma centers after serious injury rather than the hospitals they might normally choose. The performance of hospitals and health providers in a trauma system is subjected to outside review and some form of public accountability. All of the effort, money, and work committed to trauma systems requires careful scrutiny to determine whether trauma systems are indeed beneficial. Have trauma systems reduced death, ameliorated disability, and successfully prevented the problems these public health policies intend to manage?
自《意外死亡与残疾:现代社会被忽视的疾病》出版后的30年里,创伤系统作为公共卫生政策的概念有了长足发展。军队处理伤亡情况的经验让公众产生了这样的期望:如果有一个系统能让专家团队顺利协作,那么重伤公民就有望存活下来。联邦政府已投入数亿美元,以支持全国紧急医疗系统基础设施的建设,创伤系统也因训练有素的专业人员提供的及时院前护理而受益。州或地区的大城市政府已着手建立创伤系统,将其作为医疗保健与医疗保健政策政治的融合体。创伤系统可被视为医疗保健政策方面的一次试验,因为它们具有一些与其他医疗实践领域不同的特点。医院已通过外部评估,根据其提供创伤护理的能力进行了分类,这导致了指定制度的产生,即重伤人员在受伤后会被送往创伤中心,而不是他们通常会选择的医院。创伤系统中医院和医疗服务提供者的表现会受到外部审查和某种形式的公共问责。投入到创伤系统的所有努力、资金和工作都需要仔细审查,以确定创伤系统是否真的有益。创伤系统是否减少了死亡、减轻了残疾,并成功预防了这些公共卫生政策旨在解决的问题?