Champion Howard R, Mabee Marcia S, Meredith J Wayne
Coalition for American Trauma Care, Reston VA, USA.
J Am Coll Surg. 2006 Dec;203(6):951-61. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2006.08.019.
Injury has long been identified as the number one killer of Americans under the age of 34, and establishment of regional trauma systems and centers incorporating primary, secondary, and tertiary care and injury-prevention strategies has proved to be a vital element in reducing injury-related sequelae, deaths, and even costs. Despite these facts, trauma system development has not been given priority for funding in many local and state governments and only intermittently at the federal level. Consequently, many of the nation's trauma centers are strapped for funds to provide emergency care to their patients.
In response to a 2002 Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) report, which identified public support as a key element in the success of trauma system development in states and communities across the United States, a Harris Interactive study was undertaken in the fall of 2004 to determine the public's attitudes, awareness, and knowledge concerning the nature and availability of trauma care and systems of trauma care. Results of the poll were contrasted with current data on the state of US trauma systems to determine the degree of correspondence.
Results of the poll indicated that fully 61% of the American public does not know that injury is the leading cause of death for those aged 1 to 34, and most believe that a trauma system is in place in every state. Almost two-thirds of the American public is confident of receiving the best medical care in the event of serious injury and would be seriously concerned if no trauma center were nearby. But only eight states have fully developed trauma systems, and most states have no federal funding or infrastructure in place for managing the aftermath of a natural disaster or terrorist event. These and other objective data reveal the mismatch between public perceptions and reality.
Although almost 90% of Americans believe that state trauma systems and hospitals should have a coordinated trauma response, this has not been made a national priority. Trauma systems must be adequately developed and supported to fulfill the public's expectation to receive the best possible care if seriously injured, and to ensure readiness for mass casualty and terrorist incidents.
长期以来,伤害一直被视为34岁以下美国人的头号杀手,建立包含初级、二级和三级护理以及伤害预防策略的区域创伤系统和中心,已被证明是减少与伤害相关的后遗症、死亡甚至成本的关键要素。尽管如此,在许多地方和州政府,创伤系统的发展并未被列为优先资助项目,在联邦层面也只是间歇性地得到支持。因此,美国许多创伤中心资金紧张,难以向患者提供紧急护理。
为回应2002年卫生资源与服务管理局(HRSA)的一份报告,该报告指出公众支持是美国各州和社区创伤系统发展成功的关键要素,2004年秋季进行了一项哈里斯互动调查,以确定公众对创伤护理的性质、可及性以及创伤护理系统的态度、意识和知识。将民意调查结果与美国创伤系统现状的当前数据进行对比,以确定相符程度。
民意调查结果显示,整整61%的美国公众不知道伤害是1至34岁人群的主要死因,而且大多数人认为每个州都有创伤系统。近三分之二的美国公众相信在遭受重伤时能得到最好的医疗护理,如果附近没有创伤中心会深感担忧。但只有八个州拥有全面发展的创伤系统,而且大多数州没有用于应对自然灾害或恐怖事件后果的联邦资金或基础设施。这些及其他客观数据揭示了公众认知与现实之间的差距。
尽管近90%的美国人认为州创伤系统和医院应有协调一致的创伤应对措施,但这并未成为国家优先事项。必须充分发展和支持创伤系统,以满足公众在重伤时获得尽可能最佳护理的期望,并确保做好应对大规模伤亡和恐怖事件的准备。