Bartz R
Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of California, San Francisco 94143-0900, USA.
J Fam Pract. 1999 Aug;48(8):601-7.
The biopsychosocial model has been a cornerstone for the training of family physicians; however, little is known about the use of this model in community practice. This study, conducted in an urban Native American health center, examined the application of the biopsychosocial model by an experienced family physician (Dr M).
Interactions between Dr M and 9 Native Americans with type 2 diabetes were audio-recorded following preliminary interviews. Interpretations of the interactions were elicited from Dr M through interpersonal process recall and interpretive dialogue sessions. The author analyzed this data using techniques from interpretive anthropology and narrative discourse analysis.
In a preliminary interview, Dr M described a sophisticated biopsychosocial approach to practice. However, she viewed her actual interactions with these patients as imbued with misunderstanding, mistrust, and disconnection. This occurred in spite of her experience and commitment to providing culturally sensitive primary care.
Biopsychosocial models of disease may conflict with patient-centered approaches to communication. To overcome difficulties in her practice environment, Dr M adopted a strategy that combined an instrumental biopsychosocial approach with a utilitarian mode of knowing and interacting with patients. The misunderstandings, mistrust, and constrained interactions point to deeper problems with the way knowledge is formed in clinical practice. We need further understanding of the interrelationships between physicians' clinical environments, knowledge of patients, and theories of disease. These elements are interwoven in the physicians' patient-specific narratives that influence their interactions in primary care settings.
生物心理社会模型一直是家庭医生培训的基石;然而,对于该模型在社区实践中的应用却知之甚少。本研究在一家城市原住民健康中心开展,考察了一位经验丰富的家庭医生(M医生)对生物心理社会模型的应用情况。
在初步访谈后,对M医生与9名患有2型糖尿病的原住民之间的互动进行了录音。通过人际过程回忆和解释性对话环节,从M医生那里引出对互动情况的解读。作者运用解释人类学和叙事话语分析技术对这些数据进行了分析。
在初步访谈中,M医生描述了一种复杂的生物心理社会实践方法。然而,她认为自己与这些患者的实际互动充满了误解、不信任和脱节。尽管她有经验且致力于提供具有文化敏感性的初级保健,但这种情况还是发生了。
疾病的生物心理社会模型可能与以患者为中心的沟通方式存在冲突。为了克服其执业环境中的困难,M医生采用了一种将工具性生物心理社会方法与功利性的认知及与患者互动模式相结合的策略。这些误解、不信任和受限的互动表明临床实践中知识形成方式存在更深层次的问题。我们需要进一步了解医生的临床环境、对患者的了解以及疾病理论之间的相互关系。这些因素在医生针对患者的具体叙述中相互交织,影响着他们在初级保健环境中的互动。