Suppr超能文献

什么是以患者为中心的护理?模式与使命的类型学。

What is Patient-Centered Care? A Typology of Models and Missions.

作者信息

Tanenbaum Sandra J

机构信息

Division of Health Services Management and Policy, College of Public Health, The Ohio State University, 200B Cunz Hall, 1841 Neil Ave., Columbus, OH, 43201, USA,

出版信息

Health Care Anal. 2015 Sep;23(3):272-87. doi: 10.1007/s10728-013-0257-0.

Abstract

Recently adopted health care practices and policies describe themselves as "patient-centered care." The meaning of the term, however, remains contested and obscure. This paper offers a typology of "patient-centered care" models that aims to contribute to greater clarity about, continuing discussion of, and further advances in patient-centered care. The paper imposes an original analytic framework on extensive material covering mostly US health care and health policy topics over several decades. It finds that four models of patient-centered care emphasize: patients versus their parts; patients versus providers; patients/providers/states versus "the system"; and patients and providers as persons. Each type is distinguishable along three dimensions: epistemological orientations, practical accommodations, and policy tools. Based on this analysis, the paper recommends that four questions be asked of any proposal that claims to provide patient-centered care: Is this care a means to an end or an end in itself? Are patients here subjects or objects? Are patients here individuals or aggregates? How do we know what patients want and need? The typology reveals that models are neither entirely compatible nor entirely incompatible and may be usefully combined in certain practices and policies. In other instances, internal contradictions may jeopardize the realization of coherent patient-centered care.

摘要

最近采用的医疗保健实践和政策将自身描述为“以患者为中心的护理”。然而,该术语的含义仍存在争议且模糊不清。本文提供了一种“以患者为中心的护理”模式的类型学,旨在有助于更清晰地理解、持续讨论并进一步推进以患者为中心的护理。本文对涵盖几十年间主要美国医疗保健和卫生政策主题的大量材料施加了一个原创的分析框架。研究发现,以患者为中心的护理的四种模式强调:患者与其身体部位相对;患者与医疗服务提供者相对;患者/医疗服务提供者/政府与“系统”相对;以及患者和医疗服务提供者作为人相对。每种类型可沿三个维度区分:认识论取向、实际调整和政策工具。基于此分析,本文建议对于任何声称提供以患者为中心的护理的提议都应提出四个问题:这种护理是达到目的的手段还是目的本身?这里的患者是主体还是客体?这里的患者是个体还是总体?我们如何知道患者想要什么和需要什么?这种类型学表明,各种模式既不完全兼容也不完全不兼容,在某些实践和政策中可能会有效地结合起来。在其他情况下,内部矛盾可能会危及连贯的以患者为中心的护理的实现。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验