Umekita Y, Yoshida H
Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Kagoshima University, Sakuragaoka, Japan.
Pathol Int. 1999 Sep;49(9):807-10. doi: 10.1046/j.1440-1827.1999.00950.x.
The histogenesis of phyllodes tumor (PT) and fibroadenoma (FA) is closely related, and discrimination between them by histopathological analysis is sometimes problematic. Moreover, objective criteria by which to categorize the grade of malignancy in PT are still controversial. The aim in this study is to clarify whether immunohistochemical evaluation using the MIB1 antibody, which reacts with the ki-67 antigen, correlates with the histological grade of malignancy in PT, and can discriminate between PT and FA. The 47 cases of phyllodes tumor (PT) were categorized into three groups (malignant, 4 cases; borderline, 6 cases; benign, 37 cases) according to the criteria proposed by Azzopardi (1979) and were investigated by immunohistochemistry. There were significant differences in stromal MIB1-index among the three groups (P < 0. 0001), and, unexpectedly, benign PT was easily divided into two groups according only to the MIB1-index. There were significant differences in the stromal MIB1-index (P < 0.001) and stromal cellularity (P < 0.01) between the two benign PT groups. A total of 478 cases of FA was reviewed and these were divided into 403 conventional fibroadenomas (CFA), 36 cellular fibroadenomas (CEFA) and 39 fibroadenomas with focal phyllodes structure (FAPS). All cases of CEFA and FAPS, and 140 cases of CFA were studied by immunohistochemistry. The 21/215 (9.8%) cases of FA, which were designated as FAMIB, showed a high stromal MlB1-index (more than 10/0.0625 mm2). Conversely, 77% cases of FA showed no MIB1-positive stromal cells. The incidence of MIB1-positive epithelium of FAMIB was much higher than that of FA. These results suggest that high proliferative activity may be present in both stromal and epithelial cells of FAMIB. Our study suggests that immunohistochemical evaluation using MIB1 antibody correlates with the histological grade of malignancy in PT, and can select FA with high proliferative activity. However, new objective diagnostic factors useful for discriminating FA from benign PT with a low MIB1-index should be developed.
叶状肿瘤(PT)和纤维腺瘤(FA)的组织发生密切相关,通过组织病理学分析对它们进行鉴别有时存在问题。此外,对PT恶性程度进行分类的客观标准仍存在争议。本研究的目的是阐明使用与ki-67抗原反应的MIB1抗体进行免疫组化评估是否与PT的组织学恶性程度相关,以及能否区分PT和FA。根据Azzopardi(1979年)提出的标准,将47例叶状肿瘤(PT)分为三组(恶性,4例;交界性,6例;良性,37例),并进行免疫组化研究。三组之间的间质MIB1指数存在显著差异(P < 0.0001),出乎意料的是,仅根据MIB1指数,良性PT很容易分为两组。两个良性PT组之间的间质MIB1指数(P < 0.001)和间质细胞密度(P < 0.01)存在显著差异。回顾了总共478例FA,并将其分为403例传统纤维腺瘤(CFA)、36例细胞性纤维腺瘤(CEFA)和39例具有局灶性叶状结构的纤维腺瘤(FAPS)。对所有CEFA和FAPS病例以及140例CFA病例进行了免疫组化研究。21/215(9.8%)例被指定为FAMIB的FA显示出高间质MlB1指数(超过10/0.0625 mm2)。相反,77%的FA病例未显示MIB1阳性间质细胞。FAMIB的MIB1阳性上皮细胞发生率远高于FA。这些结果表明,FAMIB的间质细胞和上皮细胞可能都具有高增殖活性。我们的研究表明,使用MIB1抗体进行免疫组化评估与PT的组织学恶性程度相关,并且可以筛选出具有高增殖活性的FA。然而,应该开发新的客观诊断因素,以区分MIB1指数低的FA和良性PT。