• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

讨论与决策:初始偏好分布与小组讨论内容之间的相互关系

Discussion and Decision: The Interrelationship between Initial Preference Distribution and Group Discussion Content.

作者信息

Parks CD, Nelson NL

机构信息

Washington State University

出版信息

Organ Behav Hum Decis Process. 1999 Oct;80(1):87-101. doi: 10.1006/obhd.1999.2856.

DOI:10.1006/obhd.1999.2856
PMID:10508570
Abstract

Data from an earlier published study were used to test the social decision scheme (SDS) proposition that initial distribution of preferences within a group influences the nature of subsequent discussion. Four-person groups confronted with a three-option decision task began discussion with an initial plurality, majority, or unanimity. We found that the prediscussion distribution of preferences was predictive of eventual group choice; plurality groups introduced the greatest number of facts, followed by majority, and then unanimity; minute-by-minute patterns of discussion were very different across the three initial distributions; dominant factions contributed the most to discussion; and under initial plurality, one minority preference was discussed significantly more heavily than the other. Discussion focuses on the possible role of preference orders in group decision-making processes and on possible explanations for why groups with different intitial preference distributions show different discussion patterns across time. Copyright 1999 Academic Press.

摘要

一项早期发表的研究数据被用于检验社会决策方案(SDS)的命题,即群体内偏好的初始分布会影响后续讨论的性质。面对三选项决策任务的四人小组以初始多数、多数一致或全体一致开始讨论。我们发现,讨论前的偏好分布可预测最终的群体选择;多数群体引入的事实最多,其次是多数一致,然后是全体一致;在三种初始分布中,逐分钟的讨论模式非常不同;主导派别对讨论的贡献最大;在初始多数情况下,一种少数偏好的讨论比另一种显著更多。讨论聚焦于偏好顺序在群体决策过程中可能扮演的角色,以及对于为何具有不同初始偏好分布的群体在不同时间呈现不同讨论模式的可能解释。版权所有1999年学术出版社。

相似文献

1
Discussion and Decision: The Interrelationship between Initial Preference Distribution and Group Discussion Content.讨论与决策:初始偏好分布与小组讨论内容之间的相互关系
Organ Behav Hum Decis Process. 1999 Oct;80(1):87-101. doi: 10.1006/obhd.1999.2856.
2
Group decision making in hidden profile situations: dissent as a facilitator for decision quality.隐藏配置文件情境下的群体决策:异议对决策质量的促进作用
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2006 Dec;91(6):1080-93. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.91.6.1080.
3
A Primer of Social Decision Scheme Theory: Models of Group Influence, Competitive Model-Testing, and Prospective Modeling.
Organ Behav Hum Decis Process. 1999 Oct;80(1):3-20. doi: 10.1006/obhd.1999.2851.
4
Cognitive Diversity and Consensus in Group Decision Making: The Role of Inputs, Processes, and Outcomes.群体决策中的认知多样性与共识:输入、过程和结果的作用
Organ Behav Hum Decis Process. 2001 Jul;85(2):310-335. doi: 10.1006/obhd.2000.2943.
5
Majority and minority influence in group negotiation: the moderating effects of social motivation and decision rules.群体谈判中的多数派和少数派影响:社会动机与决策规则的调节作用
J Appl Psychol. 2007 Jan;92(1):259-68. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.92.1.259.
6
Taking the easy way out: preference diversity, decision strategies, and decision refusal in groups.走捷径:群体中的偏好多样性、决策策略与决策拒绝
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2008 May;94(5):860-70. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.94.5.860.
7
Who Takes the Lead in Risky Decision Making? Effects of Group Members' Risk Preferences and Prototypicality.谁在冒险决策中起主导作用?小组成员的风险偏好和典型性的影响。
Organ Behav Hum Decis Process. 2000 Nov;83(2):213-234. doi: 10.1006/obhd.2000.2907.
8
Contingent Weighting in Self-Other Decision Making.自我与他人决策中的权变加权
Organ Behav Hum Decis Process. 2000 Sep;83(1):82-106. doi: 10.1006/obhd.2000.2903.
9
Decision making in a multidisciplinary cancer team: does team discussion result in better quality decisions?多学科癌症治疗团队中的决策制定:团队讨论能否带来更高质量的决策?
Med Decis Making. 2004 Nov-Dec;24(6):602-13. doi: 10.1177/0272989X04271047.
10
Patients' preference for involvement in medical decision making: a narrative review.患者参与医疗决策的偏好:一项叙述性综述。
Patient Educ Couns. 2006 Feb;60(2):102-14. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2005.02.003.