Parks CD, Nelson NL
Washington State University
Organ Behav Hum Decis Process. 1999 Oct;80(1):87-101. doi: 10.1006/obhd.1999.2856.
Data from an earlier published study were used to test the social decision scheme (SDS) proposition that initial distribution of preferences within a group influences the nature of subsequent discussion. Four-person groups confronted with a three-option decision task began discussion with an initial plurality, majority, or unanimity. We found that the prediscussion distribution of preferences was predictive of eventual group choice; plurality groups introduced the greatest number of facts, followed by majority, and then unanimity; minute-by-minute patterns of discussion were very different across the three initial distributions; dominant factions contributed the most to discussion; and under initial plurality, one minority preference was discussed significantly more heavily than the other. Discussion focuses on the possible role of preference orders in group decision-making processes and on possible explanations for why groups with different intitial preference distributions show different discussion patterns across time. Copyright 1999 Academic Press.
一项早期发表的研究数据被用于检验社会决策方案(SDS)的命题,即群体内偏好的初始分布会影响后续讨论的性质。面对三选项决策任务的四人小组以初始多数、多数一致或全体一致开始讨论。我们发现,讨论前的偏好分布可预测最终的群体选择;多数群体引入的事实最多,其次是多数一致,然后是全体一致;在三种初始分布中,逐分钟的讨论模式非常不同;主导派别对讨论的贡献最大;在初始多数情况下,一种少数偏好的讨论比另一种显著更多。讨论聚焦于偏好顺序在群体决策过程中可能扮演的角色,以及对于为何具有不同初始偏好分布的群体在不同时间呈现不同讨论模式的可能解释。版权所有1999年学术出版社。