• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

A Primer of Social Decision Scheme Theory: Models of Group Influence, Competitive Model-Testing, and Prospective Modeling.

作者信息

Stasser G

机构信息

Miami University

出版信息

Organ Behav Hum Decis Process. 1999 Oct;80(1):3-20. doi: 10.1006/obhd.1999.2851.

DOI:10.1006/obhd.1999.2851
PMID:10508565
Abstract

The basic elements of social decision scheme (SDS) theory are individual preferences, group preference compositions (distinguishable distributions), patterns of group influence (decision schemes, social combination rules), and collective responses (group decisions, judgments, solutions, and the like). The theory provides a framework for addressing two fundamental questions in the study of group performance: How are individual resources combined to yield a group response (the individual-into-group problem)? What are the implications of empirical observations under one set of circumstances for other conditions where data do not exist (the sparse data problem)? Several prescriptions for how to conduct fruitful group research are contained in the SDS tradition: make precise theoretical statements, provide strong and competitive tests of theories, and interpret empirical findings in the context of robust process models. Copyright 1999 Academic Press.

摘要

相似文献

1
A Primer of Social Decision Scheme Theory: Models of Group Influence, Competitive Model-Testing, and Prospective Modeling.
Organ Behav Hum Decis Process. 1999 Oct;80(1):3-20. doi: 10.1006/obhd.1999.2851.
2
Group Decision Making with Responses of a Quantitative Nature: The Theory of Social Decision Schemes for Quantities.具有定量性质响应的群体决策:数量的社会决策方案理论。
Organ Behav Hum Decis Process. 1999 Oct;80(1):28-49. doi: 10.1006/obhd.1999.2853.
3
Collective Induction: Twelve Postulates.
Organ Behav Hum Decis Process. 1999 Oct;80(1):50-69. doi: 10.1006/obhd.1999.2854.
4
Discussion and Decision: The Interrelationship between Initial Preference Distribution and Group Discussion Content.讨论与决策:初始偏好分布与小组讨论内容之间的相互关系
Organ Behav Hum Decis Process. 1999 Oct;80(1):87-101. doi: 10.1006/obhd.1999.2856.
5
Transforming Individuals into Groups: Some Hallmarks of the SDS Approach to Small Group Research.将个体转变为群体:SDS 小组研究方法的一些特点。
Organ Behav Hum Decis Process. 1999 Oct;80(1):21-27. doi: 10.1006/obhd.1999.2852.
6
Poisson, Poisson-gamma and zero-inflated regression models of motor vehicle crashes: balancing statistical fit and theory.机动车碰撞事故的泊松、泊松-伽马和零膨胀回归模型:平衡统计拟合与理论
Accid Anal Prev. 2005 Jan;37(1):35-46. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2004.02.004.
7
[The analysis of physicians' work: announcing the end of attempts at in vitro fertilization].[医生工作分析:宣告体外受精尝试的终结]
Encephale. 2003 Jul-Aug;29(4 Pt 1):293-305.
8
Family pediatrics: report of the Task Force on the Family.家庭儿科学:家庭问题特别工作组报告
Pediatrics. 2003 Jun;111(6 Pt 2):1541-71.
9
Playing Follow the Leader: Status-Determining Traits in Relation to Collective Efficacy across Cultures.效仿领导者:跨文化背景下与集体效能相关的地位决定特质。
Organ Behav Hum Decis Process. 1999 Dec;80(3):192-212. doi: 10.1006/obhd.1999.2863.
10
[Health care systems and impossibility theorems].[医疗保健系统与不可能定理]
Harefuah. 2004 Feb;143(2):126-30, 166.

引用本文的文献

1
The Science of Effective Group Process: Lessons for Clinical Competency Committees.有效团队流程的科学:临床能力委员会的经验教训。
J Grad Med Educ. 2021 Apr;13(2 Suppl):59-64. doi: 10.4300/JGME-D-20-00827.1. Epub 2021 Apr 23.
2
Clerkship Grading Committees: the Impact of Group Decision-Making for Clerkship Grading.实习成绩评定委员会:小组决策对实习成绩评定的影响。
J Gen Intern Med. 2019 May;34(5):669-676. doi: 10.1007/s11606-019-04879-x.
3
Ensuring Resident Competence: A Narrative Review of the Literature on Group Decision Making to Inform the Work of Clinical Competency Committees.
确保住院医师能力:关于群体决策的文献叙事综述,为临床能力委员会的工作提供参考
J Grad Med Educ. 2016 May;8(2):156-64. doi: 10.4300/JGME-D-15-00144.1.
4
Assessing the preconditions for communication influence on decision making: the North American Quitline Consortium.评估沟通对决策产生影响的前提条件:北美戒烟热线联盟。
Health Commun. 2013;28(3):248-59. doi: 10.1080/10410236.2012.673245. Epub 2012 May 14.