STUDY DESIGN

Analysis of the anatomic relation of the Magerl, Anderson, and An screws to the spinal nerve.

OBJECTIVES

To compare the potential incidence of nerve root (ventral and dorsal ramus) injury caused by the Magerl, Anderson, and An techniques.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Posterior plating with lateral mass screw fixation is a common procedure for managing an unstable cervical spine. Comparative study of the Roy-Camille and Magerl techniques has been reported. However, the risk of nerve root injury for the Anderson and An techniques is not known.

METHODS

Three lateral mass screw insertion techniques were performed in this study: Magerl, Anderson, and An. Each technique involved two specimens and 20 screws inserted from C3 through C7. A 20-mm-long screw was used to overpenetrate the ventral cortex. The anterolateral aspect of the cervical spine was carefully dissected to allow observation of the screw-ramus relationship.

RESULTS

The overall percentage of nerve violation was significantly higher with the Magerl (95%) and Anderson (90%) techniques than with the An (60%) technique (P < 0.05). The largest percentages of nerve violation for the Magerl, Anderson, and An screws were found at the dorsal ramus (50%), the bifurcation of the ventral dorsal ramus (45%), and the ventral ramus (55%), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this study indicate that the potential risk of nerve root violation is higher with the Magerl and Anderson techniques than with the An technique.