• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

原发性原位体外冲击波碎石术治疗输尿管结石:使用第三代碎石机的结果

Primary in situ extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in the management of ureteric calculi: results with a third-generation lithotripter.

作者信息

Gnanapragasam V J, Ramsden P D, Murthy L S, Thomas D J

机构信息

Department of Urology, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.

出版信息

BJU Int. 1999 Nov;84(7):770-4. doi: 10.1046/j.1464-410x.1999.00284.x.

DOI:10.1046/j.1464-410x.1999.00284.x
PMID:10532969
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To review the results of primary in situ extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) for the treatment of ureteric stones using a third-generation lithotripter, the Dornier MFL 5000 (Dornier Medizentechnic, Germany).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The study comprised a retrospective review of treatment outcome in 180 patients with 196 stones who were treated with primary in situ ESWL, assessing the success of this approach and establishing reasons for failure.

RESULTS

At the 3-month follow-up, 88% of patients were stone-free; 21 patients failed ESWL and were treated by ureteroscopic stone extraction with no complications. Stone-free rates were 90% for upper ureteric, 89% for middle-third and 86% for lower-third calculi. Twenty-one patients required auxiliary procedures in the form of JJ stenting or nephrostomy. Failure of ESWL was associated with stone size (>1.3 cm) but not location or inadequate treatment.

CONCLUSION

Where prompt access to ESWL is available, primary in situ ESWL remains an effective form of treatment for all ureteric calculi, although stone-free rates are lower for larger stones.

摘要

目的

回顾使用第三代碎石机多尼尔MFL 5000(德国多尼尔医疗技术公司)进行原发性原位体外冲击波碎石术(ESWL)治疗输尿管结石的结果。

患者与方法

本研究对180例患有196颗结石并接受原发性原位ESWL治疗的患者的治疗结果进行回顾性分析,评估该方法的成功率并确定失败原因。

结果

在3个月的随访中,88%的患者结石清除;21例ESWL治疗失败的患者接受输尿管镜取石术,无并发症。上段输尿管结石的结石清除率为90%,中段为89%,下段为86%。21例患者需要以双J管支架置入或肾造瘘术的形式进行辅助治疗。ESWL治疗失败与结石大小(>1.3 cm)有关,与结石位置或治疗不充分无关。

结论

在能够及时进行ESWL治疗的情况下,原发性原位ESWL仍然是治疗所有输尿管结石的有效方法,尽管较大结石的结石清除率较低。

相似文献

1
Primary in situ extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in the management of ureteric calculi: results with a third-generation lithotripter.原发性原位体外冲击波碎石术治疗输尿管结石:使用第三代碎石机的结果
BJU Int. 1999 Nov;84(7):770-4. doi: 10.1046/j.1464-410x.1999.00284.x.
2
Treatment efficacy and outcomes using a third generation shockwave lithotripter.使用第三代体外冲击波碎石机的治疗效果和结果。
BJU Int. 2013 Nov;112(7):972-81. doi: 10.1111/bju.12159.
3
A comparative analysis of nephrostomy, JJ stent and urgent in situ extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for obstructing ureteric stones.肾造瘘术、双J管置入术与急诊原位体外冲击波碎石术治疗输尿管梗阻性结石的对比分析
BJU Int. 1999 Aug;84(3):264-9. doi: 10.1046/j.1464-410x.1999.00174.x.
4
Extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy or ureteroscopy as primary treatment for ureteric stones: a retrospective study comparing two different treatment strategies.体外冲击波碎石术或输尿管镜检查作为输尿管结石的主要治疗方法:一项比较两种不同治疗策略的回顾性研究。
Scand J Urol Nephrol. 2006;40(2):113-8. doi: 10.1080/00365590410028683.
5
Prognostic factors for extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy of ureteric stones--a multivariate analysis study.输尿管结石体外冲击波碎石术的预后因素——一项多变量分析研究
Scand J Urol Nephrol. 2003;37(5):413-8. doi: 10.1080/00365590310006255.
6
The scope and place of ultrasound-monitored extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in a multimodality setting and the effects of experiential, audit-evoked changes on the management of ureteric calculi.超声监测下体外冲击波碎石术在多模式治疗中的范围及地位,以及经验性、审核引发的变化对输尿管结石治疗的影响。
Br J Urol. 1994 May;73(5):480-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410x.1994.tb07630.x.
7
The impact of the Dornier Compact Delta lithotriptor on the management of primary ureteric calculi.
Eur Urol. 2003 Oct;44(4):482-6. doi: 10.1016/s0302-2838(03)00312-9.
8
Treatment of mid- and lower ureteric calculi: extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy vs laser ureteroscopy. A comparison of costs, morbidity and effectiveness.输尿管中下段结石的治疗:体外冲击波碎石术与激光输尿管镜检查。成本、发病率及有效性的比较
Br J Urol. 1998 Jan;81(1):31-5. doi: 10.1046/j.1464-410x.1998.00510.x.
9
Management of Proximal Ureteric Stones: Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy (ESWL) Versus Ureterorenoscopic Lithotripsy (URSL).近端输尿管结石的治疗:体外冲击波碎石术(ESWL)与输尿管镜碎石术(URSL)的对比
Kathmandu Univ Med J (KUMJ). 2017;15(60):343-346.
10
[Urolithiasis--a change in therapeutic methods extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy using a Dornier kidney lithotripter HM3].[尿石症——使用多尼尔 HM3 型肾脏碎石机进行体外冲击波碎石术的治疗方法变革]
Hinyokika Kiyo. 1989 Dec;35(12):2093-8.

引用本文的文献

1
Efficacy of combination terazosin and nifedipine therapy in postoperative treatment of distal ureteral stones after transurethral ureteroscopic lithotripsy.经尿道输尿管镜碎石术后联合特拉唑嗪和硝苯地平治疗对远端输尿管结石术后的疗效。
J Int Med Res. 2020 Apr;48(4):300060520904851. doi: 10.1177/0300060520904851.
2
Effect of ureteral calculus in outpatients receiving semirigid ureteroscope laser lithotripsy.输尿管结石对接受半硬性输尿管镜激光碎石术的门诊患者的影响。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Mar;99(10):e19324. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000019324.
3
The efficacy of tamsulosin therapy after extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy for ureteric calculi: A prospective randomised, controlled study.
坦索罗辛治疗输尿管结石体外冲击波碎石术后的疗效:一项前瞻性随机对照研究。
Arab J Urol. 2013 Dec;11(4):398-404. doi: 10.1016/j.aju.2013.08.013. Epub 2013 Sep 29.
4
A prospective randomized controlled trial of the efficacy of tamsulosin after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for a single proximal ureteral stone.坦索罗辛用于体外冲击波碎石术后治疗单个近端输尿管结石疗效的前瞻性随机对照试验
Korean J Urol. 2013 Aug;54(8):527-30. doi: 10.4111/kju.2013.54.8.527. Epub 2013 Aug 7.
5
Stenting or not prior to extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy for ureteral stones? Results of a prospective randomized study.体外冲击波碎石术治疗输尿管结石前是否进行支架置入?一项前瞻性随机研究的结果。
Int Urol Nephrol. 2012 Jun;44(3):731-7. doi: 10.1007/s11255-011-0062-3. Epub 2011 Sep 30.
6
Prediction of outcome of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in the management of ureteric calculi.体外冲击波碎石术治疗输尿管结石的疗效预测
Urol Res. 2011 Feb;39(1):51-7. doi: 10.1007/s00240-010-0274-5. Epub 2010 Apr 18.
7
Shock wave lithotripsy as a primary modality for treating upper ureteric stones: A 10-year experience.冲击波碎石术作为治疗上段输尿管结石的主要方式:十年经验
Indian J Urol. 2008 Oct;24(4):486-9. doi: 10.4103/0970-1591.44253.
8
Prediction of success of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in the treatment of ureteric stones.体外冲击波碎石术治疗输尿管结石成功的预测
Int Urol Nephrol. 2007;39(1):85-9. doi: 10.1007/s11255-006-0104-4. Epub 2007 Jan 31.
9
Removal of ureteral stones with extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and ureteroscopic procedures. What can we learn from the literature in terms of results and treatment efforts?体外冲击波碎石术和输尿管镜手术治疗输尿管结石。从文献中我们能了解到哪些关于治疗结果和治疗方法的信息?
Urol Res. 2005 Jun;33(3):185-90. doi: 10.1007/s00240-005-0462-x. Epub 2005 May 29.