• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Differences in the acid-labile component of Candida albicans mannan from hydrophobic and hydrophilic yeast cells.

作者信息

Masuoka J, Hazen K C

机构信息

Department of Pathology, University of Virginia Medical Center, Charlottesville 22908, USA.

出版信息

Glycobiology. 1999 Nov;9(11):1281-6. doi: 10.1093/glycob/9.11.1281.

DOI:10.1093/glycob/9.11.1281
PMID:10536044
Abstract

Cell surface hydrophobicity of the opportunistic fungal pathogen Candida albicans has been linked to the level of cell wall protein glycosylation. Previous work demonstrated that outer chain mannosylation, rather than overall glycosylation, correlated with cell surface hydrophobicity. These studies further suggested that the phosphodiester-linked, acid-labile beta-1,2-mannan was the correlating element. The present work tests this hypothesis and extends the previous results. The composition of bulk mannan from hydrophobic and hydrophilic yeast cells, and the acid-labile mannan from both cell types are compared. Compositional analysis shows that the protein, hexose, and phosphorus content of bulk mannan is similar between the two phenotypes. Electrophoretic separation of acid-released and fluorophore-labeled mannan shows that the acid-labile oligomannosides from hydrophobic cells are longer and potentially in greater abundance than those from hydrophilic cells. These results suggest that regulation of a single step in cell wall protein outer chain mannosylation affects the cell surface ultrastructure and phenotype of C.albicans.

摘要

相似文献

1
Differences in the acid-labile component of Candida albicans mannan from hydrophobic and hydrophilic yeast cells.
Glycobiology. 1999 Nov;9(11):1281-6. doi: 10.1093/glycob/9.11.1281.
2
Cell wall mannan and cell surface hydrophobicity in Candida albicans serotype A and B strains.白色念珠菌A和B血清型菌株的细胞壁甘露聚糖和细胞表面疏水性
Infect Immun. 2004 Nov;72(11):6230-6. doi: 10.1128/IAI.72.11.6230-6236.2004.
3
Cell wall protein mannosylation determines Candida albicans cell surface hydrophobicity.细胞壁蛋白甘露糖基化决定白色念珠菌细胞表面疏水性。
Microbiology (Reading). 1997 Sep;143 ( Pt 9):3015-3021. doi: 10.1099/00221287-143-9-3015.
4
N-glycosylation of yeast, with emphasis on Candida albicans.
Med Mycol. 2001;39 Suppl 1:75-86.
5
The N-Linked Outer Chain Mannans and the Dfg5p and Dcw1p Endo-α-1,6-Mannanases Are Needed for Incorporation of Candida albicans Glycoproteins into the Cell Wall.白色念珠菌糖蛋白整合到细胞壁中需要N-连接的外链甘露聚糖以及Dfg5p和Dcw1p内切α-1,6-甘露聚糖酶。
Eukaryot Cell. 2015 Aug;14(8):792-803. doi: 10.1128/EC.00032-15. Epub 2015 Jun 5.
6
Molecular analysis of the Candida albicans homolog of Saccharomyces cerevisiae MNN9, required for glycosylation of cell wall mannoproteins.酿酒酵母MNN9的白色念珠菌同源物的分子分析,细胞壁甘露糖蛋白糖基化所必需的。
J Bacteriol. 1999 Dec;181(24):7439-48. doi: 10.1128/JB.181.24.7439-7448.1999.
7
Surface hydrophobicity changes of two Candida albicans serotype B mnn4delta mutants.两株白色念珠菌B血清型mnn4delta突变体的表面疏水性变化
Eukaryot Cell. 2005 Apr;4(4):639-48. doi: 10.1128/EC.4.4.639-648.2005.
8
Comparison of the hydrophobic properties of Candida albicans and Candida dubliniensis.白色念珠菌和都柏林念珠菌疏水特性的比较。
Infect Immun. 2001 Feb;69(2):779-86. doi: 10.1128/IAI.69.2.779-786.2001.
9
A multifunctional mannosyltransferase family in Candida albicans determines cell wall mannan structure and host-fungus interactions.白色念珠菌中的多功能甘露糖基转移酶家族决定了细胞壁甘露聚糖的结构和宿主-真菌的相互作用。
J Biol Chem. 2010 Apr 16;285(16):12087-95. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M109.081513. Epub 2010 Feb 17.
10
The role of the Candida albicans histidine kinase [CHK1) gene in the regulation of cell wall mannan and glucan biosynthesis.白色念珠菌组氨酸激酶[CHK1]基因在细胞壁甘露聚糖和葡聚糖生物合成调控中的作用。
FEMS Yeast Res. 2003 May;3(3):289-99. doi: 10.1111/j.1567-1364.2003.tb00170.x.

引用本文的文献

1
The lipopeptides pseudofactin II and surfactin effectively decrease Candida albicans adhesion and hydrophobicity.脂肽类物质假丝菌素II和表面活性素能有效降低白色念珠菌的黏附性和疏水性。
Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek. 2015 Aug;108(2):343-53. doi: 10.1007/s10482-015-0486-3. Epub 2015 May 29.
2
Role of the Candida albicans MNN1 gene family in cell wall structure and virulence.白色念珠菌MNN1基因家族在细胞壁结构和毒力中的作用。
BMC Res Notes. 2013 Jul 26;6:294. doi: 10.1186/1756-0500-6-294.
3
Adhesins in human fungal pathogens: glue with plenty of stick.
人类真菌病原体中的黏附素:粘性十足的胶水
Eukaryot Cell. 2013 Apr;12(4):470-81. doi: 10.1128/EC.00364-12. Epub 2013 Feb 8.
4
Candida albicans cell wall proteins.白色念珠菌细胞壁蛋白。
Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2008 Sep;72(3):495-544. doi: 10.1128/MMBR.00032-07.
5
FLO11-based model for air-liquid interfacial biofilm formation by Saccharomyces cerevisiae.基于FLO11的酿酒酵母气液界面生物膜形成模型。
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2005 Jun;71(6):2934-9. doi: 10.1128/AEM.71.6.2934-2939.2005.
6
Surface hydrophobicity changes of two Candida albicans serotype B mnn4delta mutants.两株白色念珠菌B血清型mnn4delta突变体的表面疏水性变化
Eukaryot Cell. 2005 Apr;4(4):639-48. doi: 10.1128/EC.4.4.639-648.2005.
7
Cell wall mannan and cell surface hydrophobicity in Candida albicans serotype A and B strains.白色念珠菌A和B血清型菌株的细胞壁甘露聚糖和细胞表面疏水性
Infect Immun. 2004 Nov;72(11):6230-6. doi: 10.1128/IAI.72.11.6230-6236.2004.
8
The Golgi GDPase of the fungal pathogen Candida albicans affects morphogenesis, glycosylation, and cell wall properties.真菌病原体白色念珠菌的高尔基体GDP酶影响形态发生、糖基化和细胞壁特性。
Eukaryot Cell. 2002 Jun;1(3):420-31. doi: 10.1128/EC.1.3.420-431.2002.
9
Beta-1,2-mannosylation of Candida albicans mannoproteins and glycolipids differs with growth temperature and serotype.白色念珠菌甘露糖蛋白和糖脂的β-1,2-甘露糖基化因生长温度和血清型而异。
Infect Immun. 2002 Sep;70(9):5274-8. doi: 10.1128/IAI.70.9.5274-5278.2002.
10
Molecular and phenotypic analysis of CaVRG4, encoding an essential Golgi apparatus GDP-mannose transporter.编码一种重要高尔基体GDP-甘露糖转运蛋白的CaVRG4的分子和表型分析
J Bacteriol. 2002 Jan;184(1):29-42. doi: 10.1128/JB.184.1.29-42.2002.