Legler T J, Riggert J, Dove G, Köhler M
Department of Transfusion Medicine, University of Göttingen, Germany.
Transfus Sci. 1999 Apr;20(2):107-11. doi: 10.1016/s0955-3886(99)00019-3.
Leukocyte depleted blood components are frequently used to reduce alloimmunization and the risk of transfusion transmitted infection. Counting residual white blood cells in filtered blood products requires sensitive and reliable techniques. After separation of white blood cells from 500 microliters of 20 non-filtered and 54 filtered blood products we used polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and fluorimetric detection for the quantification of genomic DNA. The results were compared with results from Nageotte chamber counting. The accurate limit of detection of PCR was determined at 1 WBC/microliter (intra-assay coefficient of variation: 16.3%). PCR correlated well with Nageotte chamber counts (r = 0.77, p < 0.001, n = 74). Concordant results were obtained in 51 filtered and 20 non-filtered blood products. Discrepant results were obtained in 3 filtered whole blood units: In these blood products > 12 WBC/microliters were counted in Nageotte chamber and PCR gave a negative result. After component preparation fresh-frozen plasma and red cell concentrates of these units contained < 1 WBC/microliter using both methods. In conclusion we describe a quantitative PCR method which had about the same sensitivity and specificity as Nageotte chamber testing. However, PCR is more laborious than the standard method. As well, as reliable PCR testing requires expensive instruments and staff experienced in molecular biology, the standard method is more cost effective.
去除白细胞的血液成分常用于减少同种免疫和输血传播感染的风险。对过滤后的血液制品中的残留白细胞进行计数需要灵敏且可靠的技术。从500微升20份未过滤和54份过滤后的血液制品中分离白细胞后,我们使用聚合酶链反应(PCR)和荧光检测法定量基因组DNA。将结果与纳盖奥特计数室计数结果进行比较。PCR的准确检测限确定为1个白细胞/微升(批内变异系数:16.3%)。PCR与纳盖奥特计数室计数结果相关性良好(r = 0.77,p < 0.001,n = 74)。在51份过滤后的和20份未过滤的血液制品中获得了一致的结果。在3个过滤后的全血单位中获得了不一致的结果:在这些血液制品中,纳盖奥特计数室计数的白细胞>12个/微升,而PCR结果为阴性。在成分制备后,使用这两种方法检测这些单位的新鲜冰冻血浆和红细胞浓缩物中的白细胞均<1个/微升。总之,我们描述了一种定量PCR方法,其灵敏度和特异性与纳盖奥特计数室检测大致相同。然而,PCR比标准方法更费力。此外,由于可靠的PCR检测需要昂贵的仪器和有分子生物学经验的工作人员,标准方法更具成本效益。