Suppr超能文献

极低水平白细胞计数测定的手工及自动化方法:Nageotte计数板与雅培Cell Dyn 3500分析仪的比较评估

Manual and automated methods for the determination of leukocyte counts at extreme low levels: comparative evaluation of the Nageotte chamber and the Abbott Cell Dyn 3500 analyser.

作者信息

Müller T H, Döscher A, Schunter F, Scott C S

机构信息

Institut Oldenburg, German Red Cross Blood Transfusion Service, NSOB, Germany.

出版信息

Transfus Sci. 1997 Dec;18(4):505-15. doi: 10.1016/s0955-3886(97)00064-7.

Abstract

Leukodepleted or leukocyte-poor blood products (fresh-frozen plasma, packed red cell and platelet concentrates in particular) are widely used in current clinical practice. However, because the monitoring of leukodepletion efficiency is generally carried out (if at all) using the labour-intensive and relatively inaccurate manual Nageotte chamber technique, it is clear that any increased demand for leukodepletion monitoring would be difficult, if not impossible, to meet. As the need to identify an automated alternative to the Nageotte technique is important, this study was undertaken to evaluate such a possibility. White blood cells were enumerated in a representative series of filtered and non-filtered human blood components by both microscopic counting in the Nageotte chamber, and with the Abbott CD3500 automated haematology analyser. For the Nageotte estimate, a single analysis was made in accordance with standard procedures, whereas the automated analysis was achieved by making six replicate counts and determining the mean of four replicates after excluding the highest and lowest estimates. To determine linearity limits of the manual and automated procedures, freshly isolated leukocytes were admixed with cell-free plasma-pheresis plasma. Reasonable reproducibility (mean CV 10% for cell counts exceeding 100 cells/microL) and good linearity (r > 0.9) were observed for CD3500 determinations in four separate experiments. The manual and automated measurements also correlated well (r > 0.9) with no obvious inter-method bias for cell counts up to 40 cells/microL although there was some suggestion of lower absolute CD3500 counts in the range 40-130 cells/microL. For the comparative studies with filtered and non-filtered blood products, no significant method bias was seen with 70 individual red cell concentrates, but systematically higher CD3500 white blood cell counts were observed in the series of 68 platelet concentrates (probably due to the presence of platelet clumps). This study concludes that automation of white cell counts in blood products with the CD3500 analyser is feasible for quality control in the preparation of fresh-frozen plasma and red cell concentrates but is limited for the analysis of filtered platelet concentrates.

摘要

白细胞去除或白细胞含量低的血液制品(尤其是新鲜冰冻血浆、浓缩红细胞和血小板)在当前临床实践中被广泛使用。然而,由于白细胞去除效率的监测通常(如果进行监测的话)采用劳动强度大且相对不准确的手动纳盖奥特计数板技术,显然,如果对白细胞去除监测的需求增加,即便不是不可能,也将很难满足。鉴于确定一种替代纳盖奥特技术的自动化方法很重要,因此开展了本研究以评估这种可能性。通过在纳盖奥特计数板上进行显微镜计数以及使用雅培CD3500全自动血液分析仪,对一系列具有代表性的经过滤和未经过滤的人体血液成分中的白细胞进行计数。对于纳盖奥特计数估计,按照标准程序进行单次分析,而自动化分析则通过进行六次重复计数并在排除最高和最低估计值后确定四次重复计数的平均值来实现。为了确定手动和自动化程序的线性限度,将新鲜分离的白细胞与无细胞血浆单采血浆混合。在四个独立实验中,CD3500测定显示出合理的重复性(细胞计数超过100个/微升时平均变异系数为10%)和良好的线性(r>0.9)。手动和自动化测量的相关性也很好(r>0.9),对于细胞计数高达40个/微升的情况,方法间没有明显偏差,尽管在40 - 130个/微升范围内CD3500的绝对计数有略低的迹象。对于经过滤和未经过滤的血液制品的比较研究,70份单个红细胞浓缩物未观察到显著的方法偏差,但在68份血小板浓缩物系列中观察到CD3500白细胞计数系统性地更高(可能是由于存在血小板凝块)。本研究得出结论,使用CD3500分析仪对血液制品中的白细胞计数进行自动化对于新鲜冰冻血浆和红细胞浓缩物制备过程中的质量控制是可行的,但对于经过滤的血小板浓缩物的分析存在局限性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验