Yentis S M, Robinson P N
Magill Department of Anaesthesia, Intensive Care & Pain Management, Chelsea & Westminster Hospital, London SW10 9NH, UK.
Anaesthesia. 1999 Oct;54(10):958-62. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2044.1999.01064.x.
Crude delivery rate is used to calculate requirements for consultant anaesthetic sessions in the UK, but this calculation is arbitrary and ignores differences in case-mix between units. The term 'epidural rate' is commonly used to indicate regional anaesthetic activity but has never been defined. We challenge both these concepts and illustrate our argument by applying different definitions of obstetric anaesthetic activity to prospectively collected maternity data from 31 211 deliveries over 5 years in two hospitals. Number of anaesthetic interventions is a more accurate reflection of obstetric anaesthetic activity than number of deliveries, with Northwick Park Hospital having about 200-600 more deliveries per year than Chelsea & Westminster Hospital but about 300-400 fewer anaesthetic interventions per year. 'Epidural rate' varied by up to 30% according to the definition used. We conclude that number of anaesthetic interventions should replace crude number of deliveries as a measure of obstetric anaesthetic activity, and that the term 'regional anaesthesia rate' should replace 'epidural rate'.
在英国,粗略分娩率用于计算麻醉科会诊的需求,但这种计算是随意的,且忽略了各单位病例组合的差异。“硬膜外麻醉率”这一术语通常用于表示区域麻醉活动,但从未有过明确的定义。我们对这两个概念提出质疑,并通过将产科麻醉活动的不同定义应用于前瞻性收集的两家医院5年中31211例分娩的产妇数据来阐述我们的观点。麻醉干预次数比分娩次数更能准确反映产科麻醉活动,诺斯威克公园医院每年的分娩数比切尔西与威斯敏斯特医院多约200 - 600例,但每年的麻醉干预次数却少约300 - 400例。根据所使用的定义,“硬膜外麻醉率”的差异高达30%。我们得出结论,麻醉干预次数应取代粗略分娩数作为产科麻醉活动的衡量指标,并且“区域麻醉率”这一术语应取代“硬膜外麻醉率”。