Schmaljohn C, Custer D, VanderZanden L, Spik K, Rossi C, Bray M
Virology Division, United States Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases, Fort Detrick, Maryland 21702, USA.
Virology. 1999 Oct 10;263(1):166-74. doi: 10.1006/viro.1999.9918.
Tick-borne encephalitis is usually caused by infection with one of two flaviviruses: Russian spring summer encephalitis virus (RSSEV) or Central European encephalitis virus (CEEV). We previously demonstrated that gene gun inoculation of mice with naked DNA vaccines expressing the prM and E genes of these viruses resulted in long-lived homologous and heterologous protective immunity (Schmaljohn et al., 1997). To further evaluate these vaccines, we inoculated rhesus macaques by gene gun with the RSSEV or CEEV vaccines or with both DNA vaccines and compared resulting antibody titers with those obtained by vaccination with a commercial, formalin-inactivated vaccine administered at the human dose. Vaccinations were given at days 0, 30, and 70. All of the vaccines elicited antibodies detected by ELISA and by plaque-reduction neutralization tests. The neutralizing antibody responses persisted for at least 15 weeks after the final vaccination. Because monkeys are not uniformly susceptible to tick-borne encephalitis, the protective properties of the vaccines were assessed by passive transfer of monkey sera to mice and subsequent challenge of the mice with RSSEV or CEEV. One hour after transfer, mice that received 50 microl of sera from monkeys vaccinated with both DNA vaccines had circulating neutralizing antibody levels <20-80. All of these mice were protected from challenge with RSSEV or CEEV. Mice that received 10 microl of sera from monkeys vaccinated with the individual DNA vaccines, both DNA vaccines, or a commercial vaccine were partially to completely protected from RSSEV or CEEV challenge. These data suggest that DNA vaccines may offer protective immunity to primates similar to that obtained with a commercial inactivated-virus vaccine.
俄罗斯春夏脑炎病毒(RSSEV)或中欧脑炎病毒(CEEV)。我们之前证明,用表达这些病毒的prM和E基因的裸DNA疫苗通过基因枪接种小鼠可产生长期的同源和异源保护性免疫(施马尔约翰等人,1997年)。为了进一步评估这些疫苗,我们用基因枪给恒河猴接种RSSEV或CEEV疫苗或两种DNA疫苗,并将产生的抗体滴度与以人类剂量接种商业福尔马林灭活疫苗所获得的抗体滴度进行比较。在第0、30和70天进行疫苗接种。所有疫苗均引发了ELISA和蚀斑减少中和试验检测到的抗体。中和抗体反应在最后一次接种后至少持续15周。由于猴子对蜱传脑炎的易感性并不一致,因此通过将猴血清被动转移至小鼠并随后用RSSEV或CEEV攻击小鼠来评估疫苗的保护特性。转移1小时后,接受来自接种两种DNA疫苗的猴子的50微升血清的小鼠,其循环中和抗体水平<20 - 80。所有这些小鼠均受到保护,免受RSSEV或CEEV攻击。接受来自接种单一DNA疫苗、两种DNA疫苗或商业疫苗的猴子的10微升血清的小鼠,部分至完全受到保护,免受RSSEV或CEEV攻击。这些数据表明,DNA疫苗可能为灵长类动物提供与商业灭活病毒疫苗相似的保护性免疫。