Suppr超能文献

暗适应敏感性/伊尔伦综合征与彩色滤光片的使用:一项关于阅读成绩和能力感知的长期安慰剂对照双盲研究。

Scotopic sensitivity/Irlen syndrome and the use of coloured filters: a long-term placebo controlled and masked study of reading achievement and perception of ability.

作者信息

Robinson G L, Foreman P J

机构信息

Special Education Centre, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, Australia.

出版信息

Percept Mot Skills. 1999 Aug;89(1):83-113. doi: 10.2466/pms.1999.89.1.83.

Abstract

This study investigated the effects of using coloured filters on reading speed, accuracy, and comprehension as well as on perception of academic ability. A double-masked, placebo-controlled crossover design was used, with subjects being assessed over a period of 20 mo. There were three treatment groups (Placebo filters, Blue filters, and Optimal filters) involving 113 subjects with "reading difficulties", ranging in age from 9.2 yr. to 13.1 yr. and with an average discrepancy between chronological age and reading age of 1.8 yr. The 35 controls (who did not use coloured filters) ranged in age from 9.4 yr. to 12.9 yr., with an average discrepancy between chronological age and reading age of 2.1 yr. The treatment groups increased at a significantly greater rate than the control group in reading accuracy and reading comprehension but not for speed of reading. For self-reported perception of academic ability, two of the three treatment groups showed significantly greater increases than the control group. The larger improvements for treatment groups in reading comprehension may be related to a reduction in print and background distortions allowing attention to be directed to the processing of continuous text rather than to the identification of individual words. A reduction in print distortion, however, may not be sufficient to generate improved word-identification skills without additional remedial support, and this may be indicated by the nonsignificant increase in rate of reading.

摘要

本研究调查了使用彩色滤光片对阅读速度、准确性、理解能力以及学术能力认知的影响。采用双盲、安慰剂对照的交叉设计,对受试者进行了为期20个月的评估。有三个治疗组(安慰剂滤光片组、蓝色滤光片组和最佳滤光片组),涉及113名有“阅读困难”的受试者,年龄在9.2岁至13.1岁之间,实际年龄与阅读年龄的平均差异为1.8岁。35名对照组(未使用彩色滤光片)年龄在9.4岁至12.9岁之间,实际年龄与阅读年龄的平均差异为2.1岁。治疗组在阅读准确性和阅读理解方面的提高速度明显高于对照组,但在阅读速度方面并非如此。对于自我报告的学术能力认知,三个治疗组中有两个组的提高明显高于对照组。治疗组在阅读理解方面有更大的提高,可能与减少了印刷和背景的扭曲有关,从而使注意力能够集中在连续文本的处理上,而不是单个单词的识别上。然而,在没有额外补救支持的情况下,印刷扭曲的减少可能不足以提高单词识别技能,这可能从阅读速度没有显著提高中得到体现。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验