Cook G J, Lodge M A, Marsden P K, Dynes A, Fogelman I
Clinical PET Centre, Guys, Kings and St Thomas' School of Medicine, London, UK.
Eur J Nucl Med. 1999 Nov;26(11):1424-9. doi: 10.1007/s002590050474.
To measure regional skeletal kinetics using fluorine-18 fluoride positron emission tomography (PET) it is necessary to know the concentration of radioactive tracer being delivered to bone by arterial plasma with relation to time, the arterial input function (IFa). Methods by which IFa can be derived without arterial sampling are attractive because of their relative technical simplicity and the reduction in possible morbidity to the subject. We have compared the use of a scaled population input function (IFp) and a corrected image-derived input function from the aorta (IFi) with an IFa directly measured from a radial artery line in ten normal postmenopausal women. Both of the aforementioned methods rely only on a small number of discrete venous samples. Each subject had a dynamic PET acquisition of the lumbar spine performed after the intravenous injection of 180 MBq (18)F-fluoride. Both the IFp and the IFi were compared with the IFa in terms of the accuracy of determination of six parameters. These were: plasma clearance of fluoride to bone mineral (K(i)), unidirectional plasma clearance to total bone tissue (K(1)) and individual rate constants k(2), k(3) and k(4), calculated using non-linear regression with a three-compartment model, and the plasma clearance to bone mineral calculated using the Patlak method (K(pat)). For both the IFp and the IFi method the root mean square errors for K(pat) and K(i) were similar and small (<8.2%). The errors in determining K(1) and the rate constants k(2) to k(4) are larger by either method, but with a small advantage using the IFp method. It is concluded that the use of either non-invasive method for determining the arterial plasma input function is suitable for the measurement of the most important parameters, K(i) and K(pat), in these subjects.
为了使用氟 - 18 氟化物正电子发射断层扫描(PET)测量局部骨骼动力学,有必要了解动脉血浆随时间向骨骼输送的放射性示踪剂浓度,即动脉输入函数(IFa)。无需动脉采样即可得出 IFa 的方法很有吸引力,因为它们相对技术简单,且能降低受试者可能出现的发病率。我们比较了在十名正常绝经后女性中,使用缩放后的群体输入函数(IFp)和来自主动脉的校正图像衍生输入函数(IFi)与直接从桡动脉导管测量的 IFa。上述两种方法都仅依赖少量离散的静脉样本。在静脉注射 180 MBq 的(18)F - 氟化物后,对每位受试者的腰椎进行了动态 PET 采集。将 IFp 和 IFi 与 IFa 在六个参数测定的准确性方面进行了比较。这六个参数分别是:氟向骨矿物质的血浆清除率(K(i))、向全骨组织的单向血浆清除率(K(1))以及使用三室模型通过非线性回归计算得出的个体速率常数 k(2)、k(3)和 k(4),还有使用 Patlak 方法计算的向骨矿物质的血浆清除率(K(pat))。对于 IFp 和 IFi 方法,K(pat)和 K(i)的均方根误差相似且较小(<8.2%)。通过这两种方法确定 K(1)以及速率常数 k(2)至 k(4)时的误差都更大,但使用 IFp 方法有一点小优势。结论是,使用这两种非侵入性方法确定动脉血浆输入函数适用于测量这些受试者中最重要的参数 K(i)和 K(pat)。