Perret-Catipović M
Faculty of Psychology, University of Geneva, Switzerland,
Croat Med J. 1999 Dec;40(4):498-502.
This report raises questions about the relevance of the psychoanalytic theory and method with migrant war victims, and addresses the issue of personal limits of the psychotherapist who treats these often very ill patients. A clinical vignette and its psychoanalytic understanding introduce the question of transference and counter- transference in the therapeutic work with traumatized war victims. Psychological treatment of war victims is a very important issue. On the one hand, patients who have been tortured or otherwise traumatized are often considered to be reluctant to accept psychological help, even if they are severely disturbed. On the other hand, the psychotherapists who agree to work with such patients must be prepared to face very specific difficulties. Psychoanalytic psychotherapy may be very efficient in treating war victims, but requires not only motivated but, above all, well-trained therapists. Otherwise, the therapist may become the next victim of the patient's trauma and, for his or her own sake, work towards immediate repression instead of working through the traumatic event ending up in the repetition compulsion.
本报告提出了精神分析理论和方法与移民战争受害者的相关性问题,并探讨了治疗这些通常病情严重的患者的心理治疗师的个人局限性问题。一个临床案例及其精神分析解读引出了与受过创伤的战争受害者进行治疗工作时的移情和反移情问题。战争受害者的心理治疗是一个非常重要的问题。一方面,遭受过折磨或其他创伤的患者,即使他们受到严重困扰,也常常被认为不愿意接受心理帮助。另一方面,同意治疗这类患者的心理治疗师必须准备好面对非常特殊的困难。精神分析心理治疗在治疗战争受害者方面可能非常有效,但不仅需要有积极性的治疗师,最重要的是,需要训练有素的治疗师。否则,治疗师可能会成为患者创伤的下一个受害者,并且出于自身考虑,会努力进行即时压抑,而不是彻底处理创伤事件,最终导致强迫性重复。