Dyer C S, Kurtz R M, Strube M J
Department of Psychology, Washington University, Saint Louis, MO 63130, USA.
Am J Clin Hypn. 1999 Apr;41(4):303-15. doi: 10.1080/00029157.1999.10404229.
While interest in hypnotic time perception dates back to the 19th century (St. Jean, 1989) only recently have researchers focused on hypnosis and time estimation under more controlled conditions. Following the work of Jasinski (1986) and Mozenter and Kurtz (1992) we predicted a 2-way interaction between Group (high hypnotizable, low hypnotizable, and simulator) and Condition (waking, hypnotized) across 3 time intervals (30, 60, and 120 seconds). It was further hypothesized that "filled" intervals (with white noise) would be perceived as longer than "empty" intervals across all conditions. Sixty-two undergraduates were screened on the Stanford Hypnotic Susceptibility Scale: Form C and verbally estimated time intervals of 30, 60, and 120 seconds, 5 times each, both while in a waking and a hypnotic condition. Support was found for the predicted 2-way interaction for women only. High hypnotizable women showed a significant increase in overestimation from the waking to hypnosis condition, men did not. The predicted difference between "filled" versus "empty" intervals was not found.
虽然对催眠时间感知的兴趣可以追溯到19世纪（圣让，1989年），但直到最近研究人员才在更可控的条件下关注催眠与时间估计。继贾辛斯基（1986年）以及莫曾特和库尔茨（1992年）的研究之后，我们预测在3个时间间隔（30秒、60秒和120秒）内，组（高催眠易感性、低催眠易感性和模拟组）与状态（清醒、催眠）之间会存在双向交互作用。进一步假设，在所有状态下，“有内容”的间隔（伴有白噪声）会比“无内容”的间隔被感知为更长。62名本科生在斯坦福催眠易感性量表C型上接受了筛查，并在清醒和催眠状态下分别对30秒、60秒和120秒的时间间隔进行了5次口头估计。结果仅在女性中发现了预测的双向交互作用。高催眠易感性的女性从清醒状态到催眠状态高估情况显著增加，男性则没有。未发现“有内容”与“无内容”间隔之间的预测差异。
