Suppr超能文献

一种涉及前颅底恶性肿瘤的新分类。

A new classification for malignant tumors involving the anterior skull base.

作者信息

Cantú G, Solero C L, Mariani L, Mattavelli F, Pizzi N, Licitra L

机构信息

Unit of Cranio-maxillo-facial Surgery, Istituto Nazionale per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori, Milan, Italy.

出版信息

Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1999 Nov;125(11):1252-7. doi: 10.1001/archotol.125.11.1252.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To propose our clinical classification of malignant ethmoid tumors and to compare it with the last American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC)-Union Internationale Contre le Cancer (UICC) classification, published in 1997.

DESIGN

Retrospective review.

SETTING

Tertiary cancer facility.

PATIENTS

We evaluated 123 consecutive patients undergoing craniofacial resection for malignant ethmoid tumors involving the anterior skull base. The mean follow-up was 60 months. Fifty-nine patients (48%) presented with recurrent disease after prior therapy. We classified them with a new classification system (Istituto Nazionale per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori) based on the most commonly accepted unfavorable prognostic factors (involvement of dura mater; intradural extension; involvement of the orbit and, in particular, of its apex; invasion of maxillary, frontal, and/or sphenoid sinuses; and invasion of the infratemporal fossa and skin. We also classified patients with the AJCC classification published in 1997.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Disease-free status and overall survival rate. To study a possible association with tumor stage, the Cox regression model was adopted.

RESULTS

According to our classification, patient distribution by tumor type was T2, n = 46; T3, n = 29; and T4, n = 48 (no T1 tumors were present in the series). For previously untreated patients, 5-year disease-free survival estimates were T2, 57%; T3, 50%; and T4, 13%. For relapses, corresponding figures were T2, 31%; T3, 23%; and T4, 1%. The prognostic difference among stages was statistically significant (P<.001). Similar results were obtained for overall survival. In contrast, patient distribution among different AJCC stages was less balanced, and we failed to detect a significant association with the clinical outcome using this classification.

CONCLUSION

We propose the use of our staging system by all those specialists in the field willing to validate the classification and possibly apply it for clinical and investigational purposes.

摘要

目的

提出我们对恶性筛窦肿瘤的临床分类,并将其与1997年发布的美国癌症联合委员会(AJCC)和国际抗癌联盟(UICC)的最新分类进行比较。

设计

回顾性研究。

研究地点

三级癌症治疗机构。

患者

我们评估了123例连续接受颅面切除术治疗累及前颅底的恶性筛窦肿瘤患者。平均随访时间为60个月。59例患者(48%)在先前治疗后出现疾病复发。我们根据最普遍认可的不良预后因素(硬脑膜受累;硬膜内扩展;眼眶尤其是眶尖受累;上颌窦、额窦和/或蝶窦受侵;颞下窝和皮肤受侵),采用一种新的分类系统(国家肿瘤研究所分类系统)对他们进行分类。我们还根据1997年发布的AJCC分类对患者进行了分类。

主要观察指标

无病状态和总生存率。为研究与肿瘤分期的可能关联,采用了Cox回归模型。

结果

根据我们的分类,按肿瘤类型划分的患者分布为:T2期,n = 46;T3期,n = 29;T4期,n = 48(该系列中无T1期肿瘤)。对于先前未接受治疗的患者,5年无病生存率估计为:T2期,57%;T3期,50%;T4期,13%。对于复发患者,相应数字为:T2期,31%;T3期,23%;T4期,1%。各分期之间的预后差异具有统计学意义(P<0.001)。总生存率也得到了类似结果。相比之下,不同AJCC分期之间的患者分布不太均衡,使用该分类我们未能检测到与临床结局的显著关联。

结论

我们建议该领域所有愿意验证该分类并可能将其用于临床和研究目的的专家使用我们的分期系统。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验