Vollmer W M, Markson L E, O'Connor E, Sanocki L L, Fitterman L, Berger M, Buist A S
Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research, Portland, Oregon, USA.
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1999 Nov;160(5 Pt 1):1647-52. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.160.5.9902098.
Asthma severity and level of asthma control are two related, but conceptually distinct, concepts that are often confused in the literature. We report on an index of asthma control developed for use in population-based disease management. This index was measured on 5,181 adult members of a large health maintenance organization (HMO), as were various self-reported measures of health care utilization (HCU) and quality of life (QOL). A simple index of number of control problems, ranging from none through four, exhibited marked and highly significant cross-sectional associations with self- reported HCU and with both generic and disease-specific QOL instruments, suggesting that each of the four dimensions of asthma control represented by these problems correlates with clinically significant impairment. Qualitatively similar results were found for control problems assessed relative to the past month and relative to the past year. Asthma control is an important "vital sign" that may be useful both for population-based disease management as well as for the management of individual patients.
哮喘严重程度和哮喘控制水平是两个相关但概念上不同的概念,在文献中常常被混淆。我们报告了一种为基于人群的疾病管理而开发的哮喘控制指数。该指数在一个大型健康维护组织(HMO)的5181名成年成员中进行了测量,同时还测量了各种自我报告的医疗保健利用(HCU)和生活质量(QOL)指标。一个简单的控制问题数量指数,范围从无到四个,与自我报告的HCU以及通用和疾病特异性QOL工具都呈现出显著且高度显著的横断面关联,这表明由这些问题所代表的哮喘控制的四个维度中的每一个都与临床上显著的损害相关。相对于过去一个月和过去一年评估的控制问题,也发现了定性相似的结果。哮喘控制是一个重要的“生命体征”,对于基于人群的疾病管理以及个体患者的管理都可能有用。