Outcomes of a population-based asthma management program: quality of life, absenteeism, and utilization.

BACKGROUND

Despite the availability of the National Asthma Education Program (NAEP) guidelines since 1991, asthma remains inadequately managed. To improve quality of life, functional status, and self-management behavior of asthma patients, a large health maintenance organization (HMO) in California implemented an asthma management program in 1996.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effectiveness of an asthma management program in an HMO setting.

DESIGN AND SETTING

Prospective study. Survey data from members who participated in the intervention program and data from members who received usual care were analyzed using propensity score technique.

RESULTS

A total of 1,043 asthma patients who responded both baseline and follow-up survey were included in the analysis. From baseline to followup, participants in the in-home intervention program reported significant improvement in functional status (improvements range from 0.2 to 7.2), daily use of steroid inhaler (+4.1%), daily peak flow meter use (+6.4%), self-reported knowledge of what to do for an asthma attack (+12.4%), and feeling that their asthma was under control (+10.8%). Absenteeism (-11.8%) and hospitalization due to asthma (-3.5%) were significantly reduced from baseline to follow-up. Participants did not report significant changes in overuse of beta2-agonists and emergency room visits due to asthma. In comparison with the asthmatic patients who received usual care (non-participants), participants had significantly greater improvement on daily use of steroid inhaler (+4.0% versus -6.0%), daily use of home peak flow meter (+6.4% versus 1.9%) and self-reported knowledge on what to do for an asthma attack (+12.4% versus +5.4%).

CONCLUSION

These findings suggest that population-based programs can improve functional status, increase self-monitoring and knowledge about asthma, and decrease absenteeism and hospitalization for asthma by directly providing asthmatic patients with educational materials and self-monitoring tools. Such "direct-to-consumer" outreach programs may help bridge the gap between NAEPs 1991 practice guidelines and the reality of current asthma management.