Juniper E F, Buist A S
Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McMaster University Medical Centre, Ontario, Canada.
Chest. 1999 Nov;116(5):1297-303. doi: 10.1378/chest.116.5.1297.
To compare the effect of hydrofluoroalkane-134a (HFA) beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP; 400 microg/d) with that of chlorofluorocarbon (CFC) BDP (800 microg/d) on asthma health-related quality of life in a 12-week, parallel-group, multicenter study.
HFA-BDP is a new CFC-free preparation of BDP, which was developed as a result of CFCs being phased out from metered dose inhalers.
Following 7 to 12 days of prednisone, 30 mg/d, 347 adults with moderate asthma were randomized to receive either 400 microg/d HFA-BDP, 800 microg/d CFC-BDP, or HFA placebo for 12 weeks (all other oral and inhaled steroids were withdrawn). Patients completed the Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ), and clinical asthma status was measured at the end of a run-in period, at randomization (after oral steroid treatment), and at the end of the study treatment.
Sixty-one patients withdrew, 43 due to worsening asthma (33 placebo; 5 HFA-BDP; 5 CFC-BDP). There was a deterioration in the AQLQ score (- 0.81) in the placebo group, and the difference between this and the stability observed in both the HFA-BDP group (+ 0.13) and the CFC-BDP group (- 0.03) was statistically significant (p </= 0.003). The difference between the two active treatments was not significant (p = 0.290). The calculated number of patients who needed to be treated in order to see a benefit in one patient (with the placebo as the standard treatment) was 2.4 for HFA-BDP and 3.0 for CFC-BDP. Only weak to moderate correlations were observed between changes in AQLQ scores and between asthma clinical status measures.
HFA-BDP (400 microg/d) was as effective as CFC-BDP (800 microg/d) in sustaining improvements in asthma quality of life following withdrawal of 7 to 12 days of prednisone treatment in moderate asthma.
在一项为期12周的平行组多中心研究中,比较氢氟烷烃-134a(HFA)倍氯米松二丙酸酯(BDP;400微克/天)与氯氟烃(CFC)BDP(800微克/天)对哮喘患者健康相关生活质量的影响。
HFA-BDP是一种新型不含CFC的BDP制剂,它是由于CFC从定量吸入器中逐步淘汰而开发的。
在接受30毫克/天泼尼松治疗7至12天后,347名中度哮喘成年患者被随机分为接受400微克/天HFA-BDP、800微克/天CFC-BDP或HFA安慰剂治疗12周(所有其他口服和吸入类固醇均停用)。患者完成哮喘生活质量问卷(AQLQ),并在导入期结束时、随机分组时(口服类固醇治疗后)和研究治疗结束时测量临床哮喘状态。
61名患者退出,43名因哮喘恶化(33名安慰剂组;5名HFA-BDP组;5名CFC-BDP组)。安慰剂组的AQLQ评分下降(-0.81),与HFA-BDP组(+0.13)和CFC-BDP组(-0.03)观察到的稳定性之间的差异具有统计学意义(p≤0.003)。两种活性治疗之间的差异不显著(p = 0.290)。以安慰剂作为标准治疗,计算出为使一名患者受益所需治疗的患者数量,HFA-BDP为2.4,CFC-BDP为3.0。在AQLQ评分变化与哮喘临床状态测量之间仅观察到弱至中度相关性。
在中度哮喘患者停用7至12天泼尼松治疗后,HFA-BDP(400微克/天)在维持哮喘生活质量改善方面与CFC-BDP(800微克/天)效果相当。