Bouma J, Broer J, Bleeker J, van Sonderen E, Meyboom-de Jong B, DeJongste M J
Northern Centre for Healthcare Research (NCH), University of Groningen, The Netherlands.
J Epidemiol Community Health. 1999 Aug;53(8):459-64. doi: 10.1136/jech.53.8.459.
To measure the pre-hospital delay times in patients with proven acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and to identify possibilities for reduction of treatment delay.
Descriptive three centre study.
One university teaching hospital and two regional hospitals in Groningen, the Netherlands.
400 consecutive confirmed AMI patients, age below 75 years, admitted to coronary care departments.
Mean age was 59 years and 78% of patients were men. Within two hours after onset of symptoms half of the patients with AMI arrived at the hospital. Patient, doctor, and ambulance delay times (median values) were 30, 38, and 35 minutes respectively. Calling the personal general practitioner (GP) or the locum tenens and whether or not the AMI occurred during a weekend or on a working day had no consequences for pre-hospital delay times. At night patients waited longer before calling a GP than in the daytime. There was a positive correlation between patient and doctor delay. Twenty two per cent of AMI patients waited two hours or more before calling a GP. Total pre-hospital delay times differed between men and women. Longer doctor delay in women (36 minutes for men and 52 minutes for women) was caused by displacement of specific symptoms, in particular in women. AMI patients who were alone during onset of symptoms showed higher patients delay (72 compared with 23 minutes).
In hospital admitted patients younger than 75 years pre-hospital delay times are within acceptable limits. In some subgroups further reduction is attainable, for example in patient delay outside office hours and when patients are alone during onset of symptoms, in doctor delay in cases where women present with symptoms suggestive for AMI. Improvement of facilities for pre-hospital electrocardiographic diagnosis may facilitate decision making by GPs. Good opportunities for further reduction of treatment delay exist in shortening of hospital delay.
测量确诊为急性心肌梗死(AMI)患者的院前延误时间,并确定减少治疗延误的可能性。
描述性三中心研究。
荷兰格罗宁根的一家大学教学医院和两家地区医院。
400例连续确诊的AMI患者,年龄在75岁以下,入住冠心病监护病房。
平均年龄为59岁,78%的患者为男性。症状发作后两小时内,一半的AMI患者抵达医院。患者、医生和救护车的延误时间(中位数)分别为30分钟、38分钟和35分钟。呼叫私人全科医生(GP)或临时代理医生以及AMI是否发生在周末或工作日对院前延误时间没有影响。夜间患者呼叫GP之前等待的时间比白天更长。患者延误和医生延误之间存在正相关。22%的AMI患者在呼叫GP之前等待了两小时或更长时间。院前总延误时间在男性和女性之间存在差异。女性医生延误时间更长(男性为36分钟,女性为52分钟)是由特定症状的转移导致的,尤其是在女性中。症状发作时独自一人的AMI患者显示出更长的患者延误时间(72分钟,而其他患者为23分钟)。
在75岁以下入院的患者中,院前延误时间在可接受范围内。在一些亚组中可以进一步减少延误,例如在非办公时间的患者延误以及症状发作时患者独自一人的情况,在女性出现提示AMI症状时的医生延误。改善院前心电图诊断设施可能有助于全科医生做出决策。缩短医院延误时间存在进一步减少治疗延误的良好机会。