• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

急性腹泻期间短暂性葡萄糖不耐受的临床特征

Clinical characteristics of transient glucose intolerance during acute diarrhoea.

作者信息

Ozmert E, Yurdakök K, Aslan D, Yalçin S S, Yardim M

机构信息

Hacettepe University Institute of Child Health, Department of Social Pediatrics, Ankara, Turkey.

出版信息

Acta Paediatr. 1999 Oct;88(10):1071-3. doi: 10.1080/08035259950168108.

DOI:10.1080/08035259950168108
PMID:10565451
Abstract

Transient glucose intolerance (TGI) is an important cause of WHO G-ORS (Glucose-Oral Rehydration Solution) treatment failure and hospitalization in dehydrated children during acute diarrhoea. This retrospective case-control study was designed to determine some risk and predictive factors for developing TGI among moderately dehydrated patients with acute diarrhoea while under G-ORS therapy. Among moderately dehydrated patients, files of 22 patients with TGI and 66 other dehydrated patients without intolerance were reviewed. Patients with TGI were younger (9.7+/-10.5 mo and 11.6+/-7.8 mo, respectively, p < 0.05), the median age being 6 mo in the TGI group and 10 mo in non-TGI group. There was no difference between groups for sex, admission season, history of fever or vomiting, frequency of vomiting, presence of blood, mucous or leukocyte in stool, presence of associated disease and duration of diarrhoea on admission. The admission haemoglobin, white blood cell, blood pH, sodium and potassium levels were similar in both groups. The mean serum chloride level (116.8+/-6.9, 109.6+/-7.9 mEq/l, respectively, p<0.05) was higher in the TGI group and the bicarbonate level was lower (12.9+/-3.8, 15.3+/-6.0, respectively, p < 0.05). Stool frequency was also higher in patients with TGI (11.2+/-5.3/24 h, 5.9+/-4.4/24 h, respectively, p < 0.05). No difference was found between the nutritional status of children in both groups. More children were breastfed in the group without TGI (34/56, 61%, 6/18, 33% respectively, p=0.079, OR=0.32, 95% CI [0.09-1.11]). It was concluded that patients with TGI are younger and have high stool frequency. Although statistical significance could not be shown, breastfeeding seems to protect children from TGI, as it protects from diarrhoea.

摘要

短暂性葡萄糖不耐受(TGI)是世界卫生组织口服补液盐(G-ORS)治疗失败以及急性腹泻脱水儿童住院治疗的一个重要原因。这项回顾性病例对照研究旨在确定急性腹泻中度脱水患者在接受G-ORS治疗期间发生TGI的一些风险因素和预测因素。在中度脱水患者中,对22例TGI患者和66例其他无不耐受的脱水患者的病历进行了回顾。TGI患者年龄更小(分别为9.7±10.5个月和11.6±7.8个月,p<0.05),TGI组的中位年龄为6个月,非TGI组为10个月。两组在性别、入院季节、发热或呕吐史、呕吐频率、粪便中是否有血液、黏液或白细胞、是否存在相关疾病以及入院时腹泻持续时间方面没有差异。两组入院时的血红蛋白、白细胞、血液pH值、钠和钾水平相似。TGI组的平均血清氯水平较高(分别为116.8±6.9、109.6±7.9 mEq/l,p<0.05),碳酸氢盐水平较低(分别为12.9±3.8、15.3±6.0,p<0.05)。TGI患者的排便频率也更高(分别为11.2±5.3次/24小时、5.9±4.4次/24小时,p<0.05)。两组儿童的营养状况没有差异。非TGI组母乳喂养的儿童更多(分别为34/56,61%;6/18,33%,p=0.079,OR=0.32,95%CI[0.09-1.11])。得出的结论是,TGI患者年龄更小且排便频率高。虽然未显示出统计学意义,但母乳喂养似乎能像预防腹泻一样保护儿童免受TGI的影响。

相似文献

1
Clinical characteristics of transient glucose intolerance during acute diarrhoea.急性腹泻期间短暂性葡萄糖不耐受的临床特征
Acta Paediatr. 1999 Oct;88(10):1071-3. doi: 10.1080/08035259950168108.
2
Rehydration of moderately dehydrated children with transient glucose intolerance using rice oral rehydration solution.
Acta Paediatr. 1999 Jan;88(1):34-7.
3
A double-blind clinical trial comparing World Health Organization oral rehydration solution with a reduced osmolarity solution containing equal amounts of sodium and glucose.一项双盲临床试验,比较世界卫生组织口服补液盐与含有等量钠和葡萄糖的低渗溶液。
J Pediatr. 1996 Jan;128(1):45-51. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(96)70426-2.
4
Comparison of efficacy of a glucose/glycine/glycylglycine electrolyte solution versus the standard WHO/ORS in diarrheic dehydrated children.葡萄糖/甘氨酸/甘氨酰甘氨酸电解质溶液与标准世界卫生组织口服补液盐对腹泻脱水儿童疗效的比较。
J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 1988 Nov-Dec;7(6):882-8. doi: 10.1097/00005176-198811000-00016.
5
Comparative efficacy of rice-based and glucose-based oral rehydration salts plus early reintroduction of food.基于大米和基于葡萄糖的口服补液盐加早期重新引入食物的比较疗效。
Lancet. 1993 Sep 25;342(8874):772-5. doi: 10.1016/0140-6736(93)91540-3.
6
Clinical trial of glucose-oral rehydration solution (ORS), rice dextrin-ORS, and rice flour-ORS for the management of children with acute diarrhea and mild or moderate dehydration.葡萄糖口服补液盐(ORS)、大米糊精ORS和米粉ORS用于治疗急性腹泻并伴有轻度或中度脱水儿童的临床试验。
Pediatrics. 1995 Feb;95(2):191-7.
7
Efficacy of standard glucose-based and reduced-osmolarity maltodextrin-based oral rehydration solutions: effect of sugar malabsorption.基于标准葡萄糖和低渗麦芽糊精的口服补液溶液的疗效:糖吸收不良的影响。
Bull World Health Organ. 1996;74(5):471-7.
8
Comparative study of rice-based oral rehydration salt solution versus glucose-based oral rehydration salt solution (WHO) in children with acute dehydrating diarrhoea.基于大米的口服补液盐溶液与基于葡萄糖的口服补液盐溶液(世界卫生组织)对急性失水性腹泻儿童疗效的比较研究
J Indian Med Assoc. 1998 Dec;96(12):367-8.
9
Acute diarrhoea in infants: oral rehydration is crucial.婴儿急性腹泻:口服补液至关重要。
Prescrire Int. 2000 Oct;9(49):146-53.
10
Treatment of acute infantile diarrhoea with a commercial rice-based oral rehydration solution.用市售大米基口服补液溶液治疗急性婴儿腹泻。
J Diarrhoeal Dis Res. 1995 Dec;13(4):207-11.

引用本文的文献

1
Lactose intolerance among severely malnourished children with diarrhoea admitted to the nutrition unit, Mulago hospital, Uganda.乌干达马莱戈医院营养科收治腹泻严重营养不良患儿的乳糖不耐受情况。
BMC Pediatr. 2010 May 6;10:31. doi: 10.1186/1471-2431-10-31.
2
Does an L-glutamine-containing, glucose-free, oral rehydration solution reduce stool output and time to rehydrate in children with acute diarrhoea? A double-blind randomized clinical trial.含L-谷氨酰胺、无糖的口服补液溶液能否减少急性腹泻儿童的粪便排出量并缩短补液时间?一项双盲随机临床试验。
J Health Popul Nutr. 2007 Sep;25(3):278-84.