• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

语义或词汇句法因素:是什么决定了人类大脑中特定词类的活动?

Semantic or lexico-syntactic factors: what determines word-class specific activity in the human brain?

作者信息

Pulvermüller F, Mohr B, Schleichert H

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Konstanz, Germany.

出版信息

Neurosci Lett. 1999 Nov 12;275(2):81-4. doi: 10.1016/s0304-3940(99)00724-7.

DOI:10.1016/s0304-3940(99)00724-7
PMID:10568504
Abstract

Words from different classes have been found to activate different brain areas. However, it is unclear whether grammatical word properties, for example their being part of different lexical categories (e.g. nouns vs. verbs) or semantic features of the words (e.g. that they refer to visually perceived entities or to actions) are relevant for eliciting differential brain responses. We tested this by comparing brain potentials elicited by nouns and verbs that varied in their action and visual associations. Naturally spoken word stimuli were from three categories: (1) nouns with strong visual associations; (2) action verbs with strong associations of actions, and (3) nouns with strong action associations. Word-category specific differences became apparent around 500 ms after stimulus onset, approximately 150-200 ms after the average recognition point of the words involved. Brain responses to visual nouns and action verbs differed at central and occipital recording sites. A very similar topographical difference emerged from the comparison of visual vs. action nouns, whereas no significant difference was found between action-related nouns and verbs. These results indicate that grammatical differences alone, e.g. between two lexical classes such as action verbs and action-related nouns, are not sufficient for eliciting differential brain responses. In contrast, semantic differences between items from the same lexical category can be sufficient for changing the topography of cortical processes induced by word stimuli. This is support for associative theories of word processing.

摘要

人们发现不同词性的词汇会激活不同的脑区。然而,尚不清楚语法词性,比如它们属于不同的词汇类别(如名词与动词),或者词汇的语义特征(如它们指代视觉感知的实体或动作)是否与引发不同的脑反应相关。我们通过比较具有不同动作和视觉联想的名词和动词所引发的脑电来测试这一点。自然口语单词刺激来自三个类别:(1)具有强烈视觉联想的名词;(2)具有强烈动作联想的动作动词;(3)具有强烈动作联想的名词。在刺激开始后约500毫秒,即所涉及单词的平均识别点之后约150 - 200毫秒,单词类别特定差异变得明显。在中央和枕叶记录部位,对视觉名词和动作动词的脑反应有所不同。在比较视觉名词与动作名词时出现了非常相似的地形差异,而在与动作相关的名词和动词之间未发现显著差异。这些结果表明,仅语法差异,例如动作动词和与动作相关的名词这两个词汇类别之间的差异,不足以引发不同的脑反应。相比之下,同一词汇类别中项目之间的语义差异足以改变由单词刺激诱发的皮层过程的地形。这支持了词汇加工的联想理论。

相似文献

1
Semantic or lexico-syntactic factors: what determines word-class specific activity in the human brain?语义或词汇句法因素:是什么决定了人类大脑中特定词类的活动?
Neurosci Lett. 1999 Nov 12;275(2):81-4. doi: 10.1016/s0304-3940(99)00724-7.
2
Electrophysiological signatures of event words: Dissociating syntactic and semantic category effects in lexical processing.事件词的电生理特征:区分词汇加工中的句法和语义类别效应
Neuropsychologia. 2016 Dec;93(Pt A):151-157. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2016.10.014. Epub 2016 Oct 26.
3
Nouns and verbs in the intact brain: evidence from event-related potentials and high-frequency cortical responses.完整大脑中的名词和动词:来自事件相关电位和高频皮层反应的证据。
Cereb Cortex. 1999 Jul-Aug;9(5):497-506. doi: 10.1093/cercor/9.5.497.
4
To mind the mind: an event-related potential study of word class and semantic ambiguity.关注思维:一项关于词类和语义歧义的事件相关电位研究。
Brain Res. 2006 Apr 7;1081(1):191-202. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2006.01.058. Epub 2006 Mar 3.
5
Brain responses to nouns, verbs and class-ambiguous words in context.大脑在语境中对名词、动词和类别歧义词的反应。
Brain. 2000 Dec;123 Pt 12:2552-66. doi: 10.1093/brain/123.12.2552.
6
Nouns, verbs, objects, actions, and abstractions: local fMRI activity indexes semantics, not lexical categories.名词、动词、宾语、动作及抽象概念:局部功能磁共振成像活动反映的是语义,而非词汇类别。
Brain Lang. 2014 May;132(100):28-42. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2014.03.001. Epub 2014 Apr 12.
7
Event-related potentials to event-related words: grammatical class and semantic attributes in the representation of knowledge.事件相关电位与事件相关词:知识表示中的语法类别和语义属性。
Brain Res. 2010 May 21;1332:65-74. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2010.03.014. Epub 2010 Mar 15.
8
Neural dynamics of object noun, action verb and action noun production in picture naming.图片命名中物体名词、动作动词和动作名词生成的神经动力学
Brain Lang. 2015 Nov;150:129-42. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2015.09.004. Epub 2015 Oct 2.
9
The fox and the cabra: an ERP analysis of reading code switched nouns and verbs in bilingual short stories.狐狸与山羊:对双语短篇小说中代码切换名词和动词阅读的事件相关电位分析
Brain Res. 2014 Apr 4;1557:127-40. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2014.02.009. Epub 2014 Feb 14.
10
Neural differentiation of lexico-syntactic categories or semantic features? event-related potential evidence for both.词汇-句法类别还是语义特征的神经分化?二者的事件相关电位证据。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2002 May 15;14(4):561-77. doi: 10.1162/08989290260045819.

引用本文的文献

1
Levels of Abstractness in Semantic Noun and Verb Processing: The Role of Sensory-Perceptual and Sensory-Motor Information.语义名词和动词处理中的抽象水平:感觉-知觉和感觉-运动信息的作用。
J Psycholinguist Res. 2019 Jun;48(3):601-615. doi: 10.1007/s10936-018-9621-4.
2
Action/Verb processing: Debates in neuroimaging and the contribution of studies in patients with Parkinson's disease.动作/动词加工:神经影像学领域的争论及帕金森病患者研究的贡献
Dement Neuropsychol. 2014 Jan-Mar;8(1):3-13. doi: 10.1590/S1980-57642014DN81000002.
3
Feature-Specific Event-Related Potential Effects to Action- and Sound-Related Verbs during Visual Word Recognition.
视觉单词识别过程中对动作和声音相关动词的特定特征事件相关电位效应
Front Hum Neurosci. 2016 Dec 15;10:637. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2016.00637. eCollection 2016.
4
How vertical hand movements impact brain activity elicited by literally and metaphorically related words: an ERP study of embodied metaphor.垂直手部动作如何影响由字面和隐喻相关词汇引发的大脑活动:一项关于具身隐喻的事件相关电位研究
Front Hum Neurosci. 2014 Dec 23;8:1031. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2014.01031. eCollection 2014.
5
Nouns, verbs, objects, actions, and abstractions: local fMRI activity indexes semantics, not lexical categories.名词、动词、宾语、动作及抽象概念:局部功能磁共振成像活动反映的是语义,而非词汇类别。
Brain Lang. 2014 May;132(100):28-42. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2014.03.001. Epub 2014 Apr 12.
6
The Body of Evidence: What Can Neuroscience Tell Us about Embodied Semantics?实证研究:神经科学能告诉我们哪些关于具身语义学的信息?
Front Psychol. 2013 Feb 13;4:50. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00050. eCollection 2013.
7
Concurrent word generation and motor performance: further evidence for language-motor interaction.同时进行的词语生成和运动表现:语言-运动交互作用的进一步证据。
PLoS One. 2012;7(5):e37094. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0037094. Epub 2012 May 15.
8
The time-course of single-word reading: evidence from fast behavioral and brain responses.单字阅读的时间进程:来自快速行为和大脑反应的证据。
Neuroimage. 2012 Apr 2;60(2):1462-77. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.01.061. Epub 2012 Jan 16.
9
Understanding in an instant: neurophysiological evidence for mechanistic language circuits in the brain.瞬间理解:大脑中机械性语言回路的神经生理学证据
Brain Lang. 2009 Aug;110(2):81-94. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2008.12.001. Epub 2009 Aug 6.
10
The time course of action and action-word comprehension in the human brain as revealed by neurophysiology.神经生理学揭示的人类大脑中动作及动作词理解的时间进程。
J Physiol Paris. 2008 Jan-May;102(1-3):50-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jphysparis.2008.03.013. Epub 2008 Apr 1.