• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

单字阅读的时间进程:来自快速行为和大脑反应的证据。

The time-course of single-word reading: evidence from fast behavioral and brain responses.

机构信息

MRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit, Cambridge, UK.

出版信息

Neuroimage. 2012 Apr 2;60(2):1462-77. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.01.061. Epub 2012 Jan 16.

DOI:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.01.061
PMID:22281671
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3382728/
Abstract

We usually feel that we understand a familiar word "immediately". However, even basic aspects of the time-line of word recognition are still controversial. Different domains of research have still not converged on a coherent account. An integration of multiple sources of information would lead to more strongly constrained theoretical models, and help finding optimal measures when monitoring specific aspects of word recognition impairments in patient groups. In our multimodal approach--combining fast behavioral measures, ERPs and EEG/MEG source estimation--we provide converging evidence for the latencies of earliest lexical and semantic information retrieval in visual word recognition. Participants performed lexical and semantic decisions (LD, SD) in a Go/NoGo paradigm. We introduced eye-blink latencies as a dependent variable, in order to measure behavioral responses that are faster and less variable than traditional button presses. We found that the earliest behavioral responses distinguishing stimulus categories can occur around 310 ms. Ex-Gaussian analysis of behavioral responses did not reveal reliable differences between LD and SD. The earliest ERP differences between Go and NoGo conditions occurred around 160 ms for both LD and SD. Distributed source analysis of combined EEG/MEG data estimated neuronal generators for the lexicality effect around 200 ms in the left anterior middle temporal lobe. Thus, behavior and brain responses provide coherent evidence that the brain starts retrieving lexical and semantic information near-simultaneously within 200 ms of word onset. Our results support models of word recognition that assume a continuous accumulation of task-related information from the stimulus, which might be described by Bayesian principles.

摘要

我们通常会觉得自己“立刻”理解了一个熟悉的单词。然而,即使是单词识别时间线的基本方面仍然存在争议。不同的研究领域尚未就一个连贯的解释达成一致。整合多种信息来源将导致更受约束的理论模型,并有助于在监测患者群体的特定单词识别障碍方面找到最佳的测量方法。在我们的多模态方法中——结合快速行为测量、ERP 和 EEG/MEG 源估计——我们提供了视觉单词识别中最早的词汇和语义信息检索的潜伏期的一致性证据。参与者在 Go/NoGo 范式中执行词汇和语义决策 (LD、SD)。我们引入了眨眼潜伏期作为一个因变量,以便测量比传统按钮按压更快且更可变的行为反应。我们发现,最早能够区分刺激类别的行为反应可以在 310 毫秒左右发生。对行为反应的 Ex-Gaussian 分析并未揭示 LD 和 SD 之间可靠的差异。对于 LD 和 SD,最早的 ERP 差异在 Go 和 NoGo 条件之间大约在 160 毫秒时出现。组合 EEG/MEG 数据的分布式源分析估计了左前颞中回的词汇效应的神经元发生器,大约在单词起始后的 200 毫秒。因此,行为和大脑反应提供了一致的证据,表明大脑在单词出现后大约 200 毫秒内开始同时检索词汇和语义信息。我们的结果支持了假设从刺激中连续积累与任务相关的信息的单词识别模型,这些信息可能可以用贝叶斯原理来描述。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4e10/3382728/0d59fa7ea783/gr6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4e10/3382728/625848eb2473/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4e10/3382728/86c1a9848e69/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4e10/3382728/315f582dc167/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4e10/3382728/d86144ee5f2e/gr4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4e10/3382728/ae4897ec50ca/gr5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4e10/3382728/0d59fa7ea783/gr6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4e10/3382728/625848eb2473/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4e10/3382728/86c1a9848e69/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4e10/3382728/315f582dc167/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4e10/3382728/d86144ee5f2e/gr4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4e10/3382728/ae4897ec50ca/gr5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4e10/3382728/0d59fa7ea783/gr6.jpg

相似文献

1
The time-course of single-word reading: evidence from fast behavioral and brain responses.单字阅读的时间进程:来自快速行为和大脑反应的证据。
Neuroimage. 2012 Apr 2;60(2):1462-77. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.01.061. Epub 2012 Jan 16.
2
The time course of visual word recognition as revealed by linear regression analysis of ERP data.通过对ERP数据进行线性回归分析揭示的视觉单词识别的时间进程。
Neuroimage. 2006 May 1;30(4):1383-400. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.11.048. Epub 2006 Feb 7.
3
Task modulation of spatiotemporal dynamics in semantic brain networks: An EEG/MEG study.任务调制语义脑网络的时空动态:一项 EEG/MRI 研究。
Neuroimage. 2022 Feb 1;246:118768. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.118768. Epub 2021 Nov 30.
4
Decoding Semantics from Dynamic Brain Activation Patterns: From Trials to Task in EEG/MEG Source Space.从动态脑激活模式中解码语义:在 EEG/MEG 源空间中从试验到任务。
eNeuro. 2024 Mar 4;11(3). doi: 10.1523/ENEURO.0277-23.2023. Print 2024 Mar.
5
Predictive pre-activation of orthographic and lexical-semantic representations facilitates visual word recognition.预测性预激活字形和词汇语义表征可促进视觉词汇识别。
Psychophysiology. 2022 Mar;59(3):e13970. doi: 10.1111/psyp.13970. Epub 2021 Nov 23.
6
Context-Based Facilitation in Visual Word Recognition: Evidence for Visual and Lexical But Not Pre-Lexical Contributions.语境促进视词汇识别:来自视觉和词汇但非词汇前加工的证据。
eNeuro. 2019 May 9;6(2). doi: 10.1523/ENEURO.0321-18.2019. Print 2019 Mar/Apr.
7
Differential Phonological and Semantic Modulation of Neurophysiological Responses to Visual Word Recognition.对视觉单词识别的神经生理反应的差异音韵和语义调制
Neuropsychobiology. 2015;72(1):46-56. doi: 10.1159/000379752.
8
A revisit to interactions of stimulus quality and semantic context on N400 in visual word recognition.重新考察刺激质量和语义语境对视觉词汇识别中 N400 的相互作用。
Neuroreport. 2024 Nov 6;35(16):1030-1034. doi: 10.1097/WNR.0000000000002095. Epub 2024 Sep 25.
9
Spatio-temporal processing of words and nonwords: hemispheric laterality and acute alcohol intoxication.单词和非单词的时空处理:半球偏侧性与急性酒精中毒
Brain Res. 2014 Apr 16;1558:18-32. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2014.02.030. Epub 2014 Feb 22.
10
Can I have a quick word? Early electrophysiological manifestations of psycholinguistic processes revealed by event-related regression analysis of the EEG.我能简短说几句吗?通过脑电图的事件相关回归分析揭示的心理语言过程的早期电生理表现。
Biol Psychol. 2009 Jan;80(1):64-74. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2008.04.015. Epub 2008 May 4.

引用本文的文献

1
Can prediction error explain predictability effects on the N1 during picture-word verification?预测误差能否解释图片-单词验证过程中对N1的可预测性效应?
Imaging Neurosci (Camb). 2024 Apr 8;2. doi: 10.1162/imag_a_00131. eCollection 2024.
2
Relevance acquisition through motivational incentives: Modeling the time-course of associative learning and the role of visual features.通过动机激励获取相关性:关联学习的时间进程及视觉特征作用的建模
Imaging Neurosci (Camb). 2024 May 8;2. doi: 10.1162/imag_a_00162. eCollection 2024.
3
Misspelled-Word Reading Modulates Late Cortical Dynamics.

本文引用的文献

1
Coregistration of eye movements and EEG in natural reading: analyses and review.眼球运动与自然阅读中的 EEG 配准:分析与综述。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2011 Nov;140(4):552-72. doi: 10.1037/a0023885.
2
Are effects of emotion in single words non-lexical? Evidence from event-related brain potentials.情绪在单个单词中的作用是非词汇性的吗?来自事件相关脑电位的证据。
Neuropsychologia. 2011 Jul;49(9):2766-75. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.06.005. Epub 2011 Jun 12.
3
Experimental and theoretical approaches to conscious processing.意识加工的实验与理论方法。
拼写错误单词阅读调节晚期皮层动力学。
Hum Brain Mapp. 2025 Jun 1;46(8):e70247. doi: 10.1002/hbm.70247.
4
The left-lateralized N170 for visual specialization in advanced L2 Chinese learners.高级汉语第二语言学习者视觉特异性的左侧化N170。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2024 Aug 29;18:1392788. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2024.1392788. eCollection 2024.
5
Early parafoveal semantic integration in natural reading.自然阅读中早期的视副区语义整合。
Elife. 2024 Jul 5;12:RP91327. doi: 10.7554/eLife.91327.
6
MEG Evidence That Modality-Independent Conceptual Representations Contain Semantic and Visual Features.MEG 证据表明,模态独立的概念表示包含语义和视觉特征。
J Neurosci. 2024 Jul 3;44(27):e0326242024. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0326-24.2024.
7
Overt Word Reading and Visual Object Naming in Adults with Dyslexia: Electroencephalography Study in Transparent Orthography.成人阅读障碍者的显性单词阅读与视觉物体命名:透明正字法的脑电图研究
Bioengineering (Basel). 2024 May 4;11(5):459. doi: 10.3390/bioengineering11050459.
8
Differences in the Efficiency of Cognitive Control across Young Adulthood: An ERP Perspective.成年早期认知控制效率的差异:基于事件相关电位的视角
Brain Sci. 2024 Mar 31;14(4):347. doi: 10.3390/brainsci14040347.
9
The Stroop effect and mental imagery.斯特鲁普效应与心理意象。
Perception. 2024 Jan;53(1):61-67. doi: 10.1177/03010066231212152. Epub 2023 Nov 9.
10
Time-Lagged Multidimensional Pattern Connectivity (TL-MDPC): An EEG/MEG pattern transformation based functional connectivity metric.时滞多维模式连接性 (TL-MDPC):一种基于 EEG/MEG 模式变换的功能连接度量。
Neuroimage. 2023 Apr 15;270:119958. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2023.119958. Epub 2023 Feb 21.
Neuron. 2011 Apr 28;70(2):200-27. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2011.03.018.
4
Tracking real-time neural activation of conceptual knowledge using single-trial event-related potentials.使用单试次事件相关电位追踪概念知识的实时神经激活。
Neuropsychologia. 2011 Apr;49(5):970-983. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.01.003. Epub 2011 Jan 8.
5
Decoding word and category-specific spatiotemporal representations from MEG and EEG.从 MEG 和 EEG 解码单词和类别特异性的时空表示。
Neuroimage. 2011 Feb 14;54(4):3028-39. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.10.073. Epub 2010 Oct 30.
6
Comparison of noise-normalized minimum norm estimates for MEG analysis using multiple resolution metrics.使用多种分辨率指标对 MEG 分析进行噪声归一化最小范数估计的比较。
Neuroimage. 2011 Feb 1;54(3):1966-74. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.09.053. Epub 2010 Sep 25.
7
Distributional effects of word frequency on eye fixation durations.词频对眼动持续时间的分布影响。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2010 Oct;36(5):1280-93. doi: 10.1037/a0016896.
8
Separating the visual sentence N400 effect from the P400 sequential expectancy effect: cognitive and neuroanatomical implications.分离视觉句子 N400 效应和 P400 序列预期效应:认知和神经解剖学意义。
Brain Res. 2010 Oct 8;1355:126-40. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2010.07.099. Epub 2010 Aug 5.
9
Attentional sensitization of unconscious cognition: task sets modulate subsequent masked semantic priming.无意识认知的注意敏化:任务集调节随后的掩蔽语义启动。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2010 Aug;139(3):464-89. doi: 10.1037/a0019561.
10
Eye Movements in Reading: Models and Data.阅读中的眼动:模型与数据
J Eye Mov Res. 2009 Apr 3;2(5):1-10.