Pollak P T
Department of Medicine, Dalhousie University, Queen Elizabeth II Health Sciences Center, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.
Am J Cardiol. 1999 Nov 4;84(9A):37R-45R. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9149(99)00700-6.
The history of antiarrhythmic therapy reveals these agents to be associated with a high incidence of toxicity. Although several agents have ocular effects, amiodarone is the most widely recognized for producing adverse effects in the eyes. Corneal microdeposits are almost ubiquitous in patients being treated with amiodarone. However, they are, for the most part, benign and produce no changes in visual acuity. Lack of microdeposits should prompt the physician to investigate whether there is a problem with drug absorption or adherence to therapy. Other effects on the eye have been reported including optic neuropathy, but no causal link has been proved with amiodarone. The population of patients treated with amiodarone often have ischemic disease and/or diabetes, which affect retinal and optic nerve health. Many antiarrhythmic agents also affect lung function. The frequent association of procainamide with a lupus-like syndrome, where half the cases develop pleural-pericardial involvement, may require discontinuation of that drug. Although beta blockers and to a lesser degree, calcium antagonists, may cause bronchospasm in some patients, this is not usually a major clinical problem. Again, it is amiodarone that has the most widespread reputation for causing pulmonary toxicity. Although infrequent (< 1% incidence), it generates the most fear as it is sometimes fatal. Because of the lack of a diagnostic "gold standard," it is often overdiagnosed, placing patients at risk from overlooked congestive heart failure and infections and from recurrent arrhythmias after drug withdrawal. Patients with pre-existing pulmonary disease appear to be more at risk. Common features include indolent onset of cough, malaise and fever associated with patchy peripheral infiltrates, and severely decreased diffusion capacity. Several cases of pulmonary toxicity have had inordinately high serum desethylamiodarone to amiodarone ratios. Most cases recover with cessation of amiodarone therapy. Steroids are commonly used, but are of unproved efficacy. In terms of its toxicity, amiodarone remains the most feared of the antiarrhythmic agents. In the future, a better understanding of its pharmacokinetics, mechanisms of toxicity, and optimal dosing regimens should provide a possibility of better strategies for avoidance, early diagnosis, and more directed therapy of toxicities associated with amiodarone.
抗心律失常治疗的历史表明,这些药物与高毒性发生率相关。尽管有几种药物具有眼部效应,但胺碘酮因在眼部产生不良反应而最为广为人知。角膜微沉积物在接受胺碘酮治疗的患者中几乎普遍存在。然而,它们在很大程度上是良性的,不会导致视力变化。缺乏微沉积物应促使医生调查药物吸收或治疗依从性是否存在问题。还报告了对眼睛的其他影响,包括视神经病变,但尚未证实与胺碘酮存在因果关系。接受胺碘酮治疗的患者群体常患有缺血性疾病和/或糖尿病,这会影响视网膜和视神经健康。许多抗心律失常药物也会影响肺功能。普鲁卡因胺常与狼疮样综合征相关,其中一半病例会出现胸膜心包受累,可能需要停用该药物。尽管β受体阻滞剂以及程度较轻的钙拮抗剂在某些患者中可能会引起支气管痉挛,但这通常不是主要的临床问题。同样,胺碘酮在引起肺毒性方面声誉最为广泛。尽管发生率较低(<1%),但它最令人恐惧,因为有时是致命的。由于缺乏诊断“金标准”,它常常被过度诊断,使患者面临充血性心力衰竭和感染被忽视以及停药后心律失常复发的风险。已有肺部疾病的患者似乎风险更高。常见特征包括咳嗽、不适和发热起病隐匿,伴有斑片状外周浸润,以及弥散能力严重下降。几例肺毒性病例的血清去乙基胺碘酮与胺碘酮比值异常高。大多数病例在停用胺碘酮治疗后恢复。类固醇药物常用,但疗效未经证实。就其毒性而言,胺碘酮仍然是最令人恐惧的抗心律失常药物。未来,对其药代动力学、毒性机制和最佳给药方案有更好的了解,应该有可能提供更好的策略来避免、早期诊断以及更有针对性地治疗与胺碘酮相关的毒性。