ten Bokkel Huinink W W, Bergman B, Chemaissani A, Dornoff W, Drings P, Kellokumpu-Lehtinen P L, Liippo K, Mattson K, von Pawel J, Ricci S, Sederholm C, Stahel R A, Wagenius G, Walree N V, Manegold C
The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam.
Lung Cancer. 1999 Nov;26(2):85-94. doi: 10.1016/s0169-5002(99)00067-7.
This randomized study was designed to determine the response rates, survival and toxicities of single-agent gemcitabine (GEMZAR) and a combination of cisplatin/etoposide in chemonaive patients with non-resectable, locally advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 was given as a 30-min intravenous infusion on days 1, 8, 15 of a 28-day cycle, cisplatin 100 mg/m2 on day 1, and etoposide 100 mg/m2 on days 1 (following cisplatin), 2 and 3. Major eligibility criteria included histologically confirmed non-small cell lung cancer, measurable disease, Zubrod performance status 0-2, no prior chemotherapy, no prior radiation of the measured lesion, and no CNS metastases. One hundred and forty-seven patients were enrolled, 72 in the gemcitabine and 75 in the cisplatin/etoposide arm. Patient characteristics were well-matched across both arms. Sixty-seven gemcitabine and 72 cisplatin/etoposide patients were qualified for efficacy analysis. There were no complete responses, but 12 partial responses in the gemcitabine arm and 11 in the cisplatin/etoposide arm, for protocol-qualified response but 12 partial responses in the gemcitabine arm and 11 in the cisplatin/etoposide arm, for protocol-qualified response rates of 17.9% (95%, CI: 9.6-29.2%,) and 15.3% (95% CI: 7.9-25.7%,), respectively. Median survival times were 6.6 months (95% CI: 4.9-7.3 months) for gemcitabine and 7.6 months (95% CI: 5.4-9.3 months) for cisplatin/etoposide. The 1-year survival probability estimate was 26% for gemcitabine and 24% for cisplatin/etoposide. There were no statistically significant between-group differences in time-to-event measures, but patients in the gemcitabine arm had a greater probability of achieving a tumour response after 2 months (probability estimate: 8 vs. 0%,) and of the response lasting at least 6 months (73 vs. 45%,). Clinical and haematologic toxicity was more pronounced in the cisplatin/etoposide arm. Quality-of-life measures indicated a significant worsening of symptomatology in the cisplatin/etoposide arm for hair loss, nausea and vomiting, and appetite loss. This randomized study provides further evidence that single-agent gemcitabine is an active and effective therapy for patients with non-resectable. locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC and good performance status, and that it is better tolerated than the combination cisplatin/ etoposide.
这项随机研究旨在确定吉西他滨单药(健择)和顺铂/依托泊苷联合用药对初治的不可切除、局部晚期或转移性非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者的缓解率、生存率和毒性。在28天周期的第1、8、15天,以30分钟静脉输注的方式给予吉西他滨1000mg/m²,第1天给予顺铂100mg/m²,第1天(顺铂之后)、第2天和第3天给予依托泊苷100mg/m²。主要入选标准包括组织学确诊的非小细胞肺癌、可测量病灶、Zubrod体能状态0 - 2、未接受过化疗、未对测量病灶进行过放疗且无中枢神经系统转移。共纳入147例患者,吉西他滨组72例,顺铂/依托泊苷组75例。两组患者的特征匹配良好。67例吉西他滨组患者和72例顺铂/依托泊苷组患者符合疗效分析标准。两组均未出现完全缓解,但吉西他滨组有12例部分缓解,顺铂/依托泊苷组有11例部分缓解,符合方案的缓解率分别为17.9%(95%CI:9.6 - 29.2%)和15.3%(95%CI:7.9 - 25.7%)。吉西他滨组的中位生存时间为6.6个月(95%CI:4.9 - 7.3个月),顺铂/依托泊苷组为7.6个月(95%CI:5.4 - 9.3个月)。吉西他滨组的1年生存概率估计为26%,顺铂/依托泊苷组为24%。在事件发生时间指标方面,两组之间无统计学显著差异,但吉西他滨组患者在2个月后出现肿瘤缓解的概率更高(概率估计:8%对0%),且缓解持续至少6个月的概率更高(73%对45%)。顺铂/依托泊苷组的临床和血液学毒性更为明显。生活质量指标显示,顺铂/依托泊苷组在脱发、恶心呕吐和食欲减退方面的症状明显恶化。这项随机研究进一步证明,吉西他滨单药对不可切除、局部晚期或转移性NSCLC且体能状态良好的患者是一种有效且耐受性良好的治疗方法,其耐受性优于顺铂/依托泊苷联合用药。