Wachters F M, Van Putten J W G, Kramer H, Erjavec Z, Eppinga P, Strijbos J H, de Leede G P J, Boezen H M, de Vries E G E, Groen H J M
Department of Pulmonary Diseases, University Hospital Groningen, PO Box 30.001, 9700 RB Groningen, The Netherlands.
Br J Cancer. 2003 Oct 6;89(7):1192-9. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6601283.
The purpose of our study was to compare progression-free survival and quality of life (QOL) after cisplatin-gemcitabine (CG) or epirubicin-gemcitabine (EG) in chemotherapy-naive patients with unresectable non-small-cell lung cancer. Patients (n=240) were randomised to receive gemcitabine 1125 mg x m(-2) (days 1 and 8) plus either cisplatin 80 mg x m(-2) (day 2) or epirubicin 100 mg x m(-2) (day 1) every 3 weeks for a maximum of five cycles. Eligible patients had normal organ functions and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status <or=2. QOL was measured with European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30 and LC13 questionnaires. There were no significant differences in median progression-free survival (CG 26 weeks, EG 23 weeks), median overall survival (CG 43 weeks, EG 36 weeks), or tumour response rates (CG 46%, EG 36%). Toxicity was mainly haematologic. In the EG arm granulocytopenia occurred more frequently, leading to more febrile neutropenia. Also, elevation of serum transaminases, mucositis, fever, and decline in LVEF were more common in the EG arm. In the CG arm, more patients experienced elevated serum creatinine levels, sensory neuropathy, nausea, and vomiting. Global QOL was not different in both arms. Progression-free survival, overall survival, response rate, and QOL were not different between both arms; however, overall toxicity was more severe in the EG arm.
我们研究的目的是比较顺铂-吉西他滨(CG)或表柔比星-吉西他滨(EG)方案用于初治的不可切除非小细胞肺癌患者后的无进展生存期和生活质量(QOL)。患者(n = 240)被随机分组,接受吉西他滨1125 mg x m(-2)(第1天和第8天),每3周加用顺铂80 mg x m(-2)(第2天)或表柔比星100 mg x m(-2)(第1天),最多5个周期。符合条件的患者器官功能正常,东部肿瘤协作组体能状态≤2。使用欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织QLQ-C30和LC13问卷测量生活质量。中位无进展生存期(CG组26周,EG组23周)、中位总生存期(CG组43周,EG组36周)或肿瘤缓解率(CG组46%,EG组36%)无显著差异。毒性主要为血液学毒性。在EG组,粒细胞减少更频繁发生,导致更多发热性中性粒细胞减少。此外,EG组血清转氨酶升高、黏膜炎、发热和左心室射血分数下降更常见。在CG组,更多患者出现血清肌酐水平升高、感觉神经病变、恶心和呕吐。两组的总体生活质量无差异。两组的无进展生存期、总生存期、缓解率和生活质量无差异;然而,EG组的总体毒性更严重。