Suppr超能文献

头孢吡肟及其他广谱抗菌药物对几类革兰氏阴性杆菌和金黄色葡萄球菌的体外活性。

In-vitro activity of cefepime and other broad-spectrum antimicrobials against several groups of gram-negative bacilli and Staphylococcus aureus.

作者信息

Tallis E, Rudensky B, Attias D, Raveh D, Schlesinger Y, Yinnon A M

机构信息

Infectious Diseases Unit, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel.

出版信息

Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 1999 Oct;35(2):121-6. doi: 10.1016/s0732-8893(99)00062-0.

Abstract

The in vitro activity of cefepime was compared with that of amikacin, ceftazidime, imipenem, ciprofloxacin, and piperacillin-tazobactam by using the E-test against five groups of carefully selected organisms: Klebsiella pneumoniae (68 isololates), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (62), methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) (60), and two groups of Enterobacteriaceae (60 and 62 isolates, respectively). The bacteria were subdivided according to whether the infection was nosocomial or community-acquired, applying accepted and predefined criteria. These isolates were obtained from patients admitted to our medical center throughout 1998. We retrospectively compared antimicrobial susceptibilities of the study sample with those of the +/- 3000 bacterial strains isolated from blood stream infections since 1990: the study sample appeared to represent adequately the clinical databank. Presence of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL) was determined in all groups of Enterobacteriaceae with the ESBL screening E-test strip. Of the 252 Gram-negative bacilli tested, 242 (96%) were susceptible to cefepime, whereas only 168 (67%) were susceptible to ceftazidime, 211 (84%) to amikacin, and 220 (87%) to piperacillin-tazobactam (p < 0.001). Imipenem was slightly superior to cefepime with only seven isolates resistant (3%), six of which were P. aeruginosa. Cefepime was more active against Enterobacteriaceae than ceftazidime (93% vs. 72%, p < 0.001). This superiority was most evident against nosocomial strains of K. pneumoniae, against which cefepime was > three times more active than ceftazidime. The high level of resistance seen in nosocomial isolates of K. pneumoniae is consistent with high rates of ESBL production (69%, compared with 15-26% in other Enterobacteriaceae). The MIC90 of cefepime to methicillin-sensitive S. aureus was 1.5 micrograms/mL, whereas that of ceftazidime was 4 micrograms/mL; the susceptibility rate of both was 100%. In conclusion, cefepime possesses in vitro potencies against MSSA and current clinical strains of Gram-negative bacilli, many of which harbor resistance to other antimicrobial agents. Hence, it seems very suitable for empiric coverage of serious nosocomial infections.

摘要

通过使用E试验,将头孢吡肟与阿米卡星、头孢他啶、亚胺培南、环丙沙星和哌拉西林-他唑巴坦的体外活性进行比较,受试对象为精心挑选的五组微生物:肺炎克雷伯菌(68株分离菌)、铜绿假单胞菌(62株)、甲氧西林敏感金黄色葡萄球菌(MSSA,60株),以及两组肠杆菌科细菌(分别为60株和62株分离菌)。根据感染是医院获得性还是社区获得性,采用公认的预定义标准对细菌进行细分。这些分离菌取自1998年全年入住我们医疗中心的患者。我们回顾性地比较了研究样本与1990年以来从血流感染中分离出的约3000株细菌菌株的药敏情况:研究样本似乎能充分代表临床数据库。使用ESBL筛选E试验条对所有肠杆菌科细菌组进行超广谱β-内酰胺酶(ESBL)检测。在252株受试革兰阴性杆菌中,242株(96%)对头孢吡肟敏感,而对头孢他啶敏感的仅168株(67%),对阿米卡星敏感的211株(84%),对哌拉西林-他唑巴坦敏感的220株(87%)(p<0.001)。亚胺培南略优于头孢吡肟,仅有7株分离菌耐药(3%),其中6株为铜绿假单胞菌。头孢吡肟对肠杆菌科细菌的活性高于头孢他啶(93%对72%,p<0.001)。这种优势在医院获得性肺炎克雷伯菌菌株中最为明显,头孢吡肟对其活性比对头孢他啶高3倍以上。医院获得性肺炎克雷伯菌分离株中出现的高耐药率与ESBL高产率一致(69%,而其他肠杆菌科细菌为15 - 26%)。头孢吡肟对甲氧西林敏感金黄色葡萄球菌的MIC90为1.5微克/毫升,而头孢他啶为4微克/毫升;两者的敏感率均为100%。总之,头孢吡肟对MSSA和目前临床革兰阴性杆菌菌株具有体外抗菌活性,其中许多菌株对其他抗菌药物耐药。因此,它似乎非常适合经验性覆盖严重的医院获得性感染。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验