• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

乳腺实性肿块的良恶性鉴别:超声诊断

Benign versus malignant solid breast masses: US differentiation.

作者信息

Rahbar G, Sie A C, Hansen G C, Prince J S, Melany M L, Reynolds H E, Jackson V P, Sayre J W, Bassett L W

机构信息

Iris Cantor Center for Breast Imaging, Department of Radiological Sciences, UCLA School of Medicine 90095-6952, USA.

出版信息

Radiology. 1999 Dec;213(3):889-94. doi: 10.1148/radiology.213.3.r99dc20889.

DOI:10.1148/radiology.213.3.r99dc20889
PMID:10580971
Abstract

PURPOSE

To investigate the general applicability and interobserver variability of ultrasonographic (US) features in differentiating benign from malignant solid breast masses.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

One hundred sixty-two consecutive solid masses with a tissue diagnosis were reviewed. Three radiologists reviewed the masses without knowledge of clinical history or histologic examination results.

RESULTS

US features that most reliably characterize masses as benign were a round or oval shape (67 of 71 [94%] were benign), circumscribed margins (95 of 104 [91%] were benign), and a width-to-anteroposterior (AP) dimension ratio greater than 1.4 (82 of 92 [89%] were benign). Features that characterize masses as malignant included irregular shape (19 of 31 [61%] were malignant), microlobulated (four of six [67%] were malignant) or spiculated (two of three [67%] were malignant) margins, and width-to-AP dimension ratio of 1.4 or less (28 of 70 [40%] were malignant). If the three most reliable criteria had been strictly applied by each radiologist, the overall cancer biopsy yield would have increased (from 23% to 39%) by 16%. When US images and mammograms were available, the increase in biopsy yield contributed by US was not statistically significant (2%, P = .73). However, in independent reviews, one to three reviewers interpreted four carcinomas as benign at US.

CONCLUSION

The data confirm that certain US features can help differentiate benign from malignant masses. However, practice and interpreter variability should be further explored before these criteria are generally applied to defer biopsy of solid masses.

摘要

目的

探讨超声(US)特征在鉴别乳腺实性肿块良恶性方面的总体适用性及观察者间的变异性。

材料与方法

回顾了162例经组织学诊断的连续性实性肿块。三位放射科医生在不了解临床病史或组织学检查结果的情况下对这些肿块进行了评估。

结果

最可靠地将肿块特征为良性的US特征包括圆形或椭圆形(71例中的67例[94%]为良性)、边界清晰(104例中的95例[91%]为良性)以及宽度与前后径(AP)比值大于1.4(92例中的82例[89%]为良性)。将肿块特征为恶性的特征包括不规则形状(31例中的19例[61%]为恶性)、微叶状(6例中的4例[67%]为恶性)或毛刺状(3例中的2例[67%]为恶性)边界以及宽度与AP比值为1.4或更小(70例中的28例[40%]为恶性)。如果每位放射科医生严格应用这三个最可靠的标准,总体癌症活检率将提高16%(从23%提高到39%)。当有US图像和乳腺X线照片时,US导致的活检率增加无统计学意义(2%,P = 0.73)。然而,在独立评估中,一至三位评估者将4例癌在US检查时判为良性。

结论

数据证实某些US特征有助于鉴别肿块的良恶性。然而,在这些标准普遍应用于推迟实性肿块活检之前,应进一步探讨操作和解释的变异性。

相似文献

1
Benign versus malignant solid breast masses: US differentiation.乳腺实性肿块的良恶性鉴别:超声诊断
Radiology. 1999 Dec;213(3):889-94. doi: 10.1148/radiology.213.3.r99dc20889.
2
Ultrasound differentiation of benign versus malignant solid breast masses.乳腺实性肿块良恶性的超声鉴别
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2004 Mar;14(3):166-9.
3
Contribution of ultrasonography and fine-needle aspiration cytology to the differential diagnosis of palpable solid breast lesions.超声检查和细针穿刺细胞学检查对可触及乳腺实性病变鉴别诊断的贡献。
Acta Radiol. 1999 Jul;40(4):383-9. doi: 10.3109/02841859909177751.
4
[Preoperative wire localisation of breast lesions by tissue harmonic imaging (THI) sonography].
Rofo. 2002 Sep;174(9):1121-5. doi: 10.1055/s-2002-33932.
5
Aliasing artifact depicted on ultrasound (US)-elastography for breast cystic lesions mimicking solid masses.超声(US)弹性成像中显示的伪像,该伪像出现在模拟实性肿块的乳腺囊性病变中。
Acta Radiol. 2011 Feb 1;52(1):3-7. doi: 10.1258/ar.2010.100116.
6
Diagnostic value of breast ultrasound in mammography BI-RADS 0 and clinically indeterminate or suspicious of malignancy breast lesions.乳腺超声对乳腺影像报告和数据系统(BI-RADS)0类以及临床诊断不明确或怀疑为恶性的乳腺病变的诊断价值。
Vojnosanit Pregl. 2016 Mar;73(3):239-45. doi: 10.2298/vsp140508001d.
7
Multicenter study of ultrasound real-time tissue elastography in 779 cases for the assessment of breast lesions: improved diagnostic performance by combining the BI-RADS®-US classification system with sonoelastography.多中心研究 779 例超声实时组织弹性成像用于评估乳腺病变:结合 BI-RADS®-US 分类系统与声弹性成像提高诊断性能。
Ultraschall Med. 2010 Oct;31(5):484-91. doi: 10.1055/s-0029-1245282. Epub 2010 Apr 20.
8
[Sonographic criteria for the differentiation of benign and malignant breast lesions using real-time spatial compound imaging in combination with XRES adaptive image processing].[利用实时空间复合成像结合XRES自适应图像处理鉴别乳腺良恶性病变的超声标准]
Ultraschall Med. 2012 Jun;33(3):270-4. doi: 10.1055/s-0029-1245497. Epub 2010 Jul 7.
9
Automated breast ultrasound: lesion detection and BI-RADS classification--a pilot study.自动乳腺超声:病变检测与BI-RADS分类——一项初步研究。
Rofo. 2008 Sep;180(9):804-8. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1027563. Epub 2008 Aug 14.
10
Comparison of conventional and automated breast volume ultrasound in the description and characterization of solid breast masses based on BI-RADS features.基于BI-RADS特征,比较传统乳腺容积超声与自动乳腺容积超声在实性乳腺肿块描述和特征分析中的应用。
Breast Cancer. 2014 Jul;21(4):423-8. doi: 10.1007/s12282-012-0419-1. Epub 2012 Oct 20.

引用本文的文献

1
Role of Image-Guided Biopsy in Nonpalpable Breast Lesions: A Study in the Sub-Himalayan Region of North India.影像引导下活检在不可触及乳腺病变中的作用:印度北部喜马拉雅山地区的一项研究
South Asian J Cancer. 2024 Oct 29;14(1):53-61. doi: 10.1055/s-0044-1792007. eCollection 2025 Jan.
2
Evaluation of BI-RADS 3 Ultrasound Findings: the Frequency and Incidence of Malignant Lesions, and Tumor Size.乳腺影像报告和数据系统(BI-RADS)3类超声检查结果评估:恶性病变的频率、发生率及肿瘤大小
Acta Med Acad. 2025 Apr;54(1):1-6. doi: 10.5644/ama2006-124.467.
3
Multimodal Machine Learning-Based Ductal Carcinoma in situ Prediction from Breast Fibromatosis.
基于多模态机器学习的乳腺纤维瘤病原位导管癌预测
Cancer Manag Res. 2024 Jul 12;16:811-823. doi: 10.2147/CMAR.S467400. eCollection 2024.
4
Neural Network Pattern Recognition of Ultrasound Image Gray Scale Intensity Histograms of Breast Lesions to Differentiate Between Benign and Malignant Lesions: Analytical Study.基于神经网络模式识别的乳腺病变超声图像灰度强度直方图鉴别良恶性病变的分析研究
JMIR Biomed Eng. 2021 Jun 2;6(2):e23808. doi: 10.2196/23808.
5
Differential diagnosis of breast mucinous carcinoma with an oval shape from fibroadenoma based on ultrasonographic features.基于超声特征鉴别乳腺黏液癌与椭圆形纤维腺瘤。
BMC Womens Health. 2024 Feb 3;24(1):87. doi: 10.1186/s12905-024-02910-w.
6
The Correlation of Sonographic and Histopathologic Findings in the Diagnosis of Palpable Breast Masses in Zaria.扎里亚可触及乳腺肿块诊断中超声检查与组织病理学检查结果的相关性
J West Afr Coll Surg. 2023 Jan-Mar;13(1):74-78. doi: 10.4103/jwas.jwas_218_22. Epub 2023 Jan 18.
7
Comparison of ultrasonographic and mammographic features of extremely rare papillary carcinoma and invasive ductal carcinoma.极罕见的乳头状癌与浸润性导管癌的超声和乳腺X线特征比较。
Contemp Oncol (Pozn). 2022;26(4):275-281. doi: 10.5114/wo.2023.124755. Epub 2022 Dec 30.
8
Fully automatic tumor segmentation of breast ultrasound images with deep learning.基于深度学习的乳腺超声图像全自动肿瘤分割。
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2023 Jan;24(1):e13863. doi: 10.1002/acm2.13863. Epub 2022 Dec 9.
9
The tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte ultrasonography score can provide a diagnostic prediction of lymphocyte-predominant breast cancer preoperatively.肿瘤浸润淋巴细胞超声评分可术前对淋巴细胞为主型乳腺癌提供诊断预测。
J Med Ultrason (2001). 2022 Oct;49(4):709-717. doi: 10.1007/s10396-022-01240-4. Epub 2022 Aug 24.
10
Ultrasonography Combined With Contrast-enhanced Ultrasonography Can Predict Lymphocyte-predominant Breast Cancer.超声检查联合超声造影可预测淋巴细胞为主型乳腺癌。
Cancer Diagn Progn. 2021 Jul 3;1(4):309-316. doi: 10.21873/cdp.10041. eCollection 2021 Sep-Oct.