Ljungquist T, Harms-Ringdahl K, Nygren A, Jensen I
Department of Surgical Sciences, Karolinska Institutet, Sweden.
Physiother Res Int. 1999;4(3):214-32. doi: 10.1002/pri.167.
The intra- and inter-rater reliability of 11 tests assembled by physiotherapists for clinical purposes was investigated. Forty-five patients and 23 healthy volunteers participated in the study.
Twenty-one patients were tested simultaneously and independently by two physiotherapists to determine inter-rater reliability for two raters. Twenty-four patients and 11 healthy volunteers were tested by one physiotherapist three times in a week to determine intra-rater reliability over time. Twelve healthy volunteers were tested by three different physiotherapists in a week to determine inter-rater reliability for three raters.
Inter-rater agreement for two simultaneous raters was clinically acceptable. Repeatability on three test occasions was clinically acceptable in six of the 11 tests. There were no systematic differences between occasions.
Intra- and inter-rater reliability was acceptable for six of the 11 tests in the form described here: three gait tests, two functional lifting tests and a functional muscular endurance test in the right leg. If these tests are to be used as outcome measures, account must be taken of the size of the typical fluctuation in measurements shown. The repeatability figures given may be used as guidelines for interpreting the clinical value of possible changes in test values.
对物理治疗师为临床目的而组合的11项测试的评分者内和评分者间信度进行了调查。45名患者和23名健康志愿者参与了该研究。
21名患者由两名物理治疗师同时独立进行测试,以确定两名评分者的评分者间信度。24名患者和11名健康志愿者由一名物理治疗师在一周内进行三次测试,以确定评分者内随时间的信度。12名健康志愿者在一周内由三名不同的物理治疗师进行测试,以确定三名评分者的评分者间信度。
两名同时进行评分的评分者间的一致性在临床上是可接受的。11项测试中有6项在三次测试中的重复性在临床上是可接受的。不同测试场合之间没有系统差异。
在此处所述形式的11项测试中,有6项的评分者内和评分者间信度是可接受的:三项步态测试、两项功能性提举测试和一项右腿功能性肌肉耐力测试。如果将这些测试用作结果指标,则必须考虑所显示测量值的典型波动大小。给出的重复性数据可作为解释测试值可能变化的临床价值的指导。