Watson R L, Dowell S F, Jayaraman M, Keyserling H, Kolczak M, Schwartz B
Respiratory Diseases Branch, National Center for Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Atlanta, GA 30333, USA.
Pediatrics. 1999 Dec;104(6):1251-7. doi: 10.1542/peds.104.6.1251.
In response to the dramatic emergence of resistant pneumococci, more judicious use of antibiotics has been advocated. Physician beliefs, their prescribing practices, and the attitudes of patients have been evaluated previously in separate studies.
This 3-part study included a statewide mailed survey, office chart reviews, and parent telephone interviews. We compared survey responses of 366 licensed pediatricians and family physicians in Georgia to recently published recommendations on diagnosis and treatment of upper respiratory infections (URIs). We further evaluated 25 randomly selected pediatricians from 119 surveyed in the Atlanta metropolitan area. For each, charts from the first 30 patients between the ages of 12 and 72 months seen on a randomly selected date were reviewed for encounters during the preceding year. A sample of parents from each practice were interviewed by telephone.
In the survey, physicians agreed that overuse of antibiotics is a major factor contributing to the development of antibiotic resistance (97%), and that they should consider selective pressure for resistance in their decisions on providing antibiotic treatment for URIs in children in their practices (83%). However, many reported practices do not conform to the recently published principles for judicious antibiotic use. For example, 69% of physicians considered purulent rhinitis a diagnostic finding for sinusitis; 86% prescribed antibiotics for bronchitis regardless of the duration of cough; and 42% prescribed antibiotics for the common cold. Reported practices by family physicians were more often at odds with the published principles: they were significantly more likely than pediatricians to omit pneumatic otoscopy (46% vs 25%); to omit the requirement for prolonged symptoms to diagnose sinusitis (median 4 vs 10 days); and to omit laboratory testing for pharyngitis (27% vs 14%). Of the 7531 encounters analyzed in the chart review, 43% resulted in an antibiotic prescription, including 11% of checkups, 18% of telephone calls, and 72% of visits for URIs. There was wide variability in the overall antibiotic use rates among the 25 physicians (1-10 courses per child per year). There was an even wider variability in some diagnosis-specific rates; bronchitis and sinusitis in particular. Those with the highest antibiotic prescribing rates had up to 30% more return office visits. Physicians who prescribed antibiotics for purulent rhinitis were more likely to see parents who believed that their children should be evaluated for cold symptoms.
Physicians recognize the problem of antibiotic resistance but their reported practices are not in line with recently published recommendations for most pediatric URIs. The actual prescribing practices of pediatricians are often considerably different from their close colleagues. Patient beliefs are correlated with their own physician's practices.
为应对耐药肺炎球菌的急剧出现,人们提倡更明智地使用抗生素。此前已分别对医生的观念、他们的处方行为以及患者的态度进行了研究。
这项分为三个部分的研究包括一项全州范围的邮寄调查、办公室病历审查以及家长电话访谈。我们将佐治亚州366名有执照的儿科医生和家庭医生的调查回复与最近发表的关于上呼吸道感染(URIs)诊断和治疗的建议进行了比较。我们还从亚特兰大市区接受调查的119名儿科医生中随机选取了25名进行进一步评估。对于每一位医生,随机选择一个日期,查看其在前一年中诊治的年龄在12至72个月之间的前30名患者的病历。对每个诊所的一部分家长进行了电话访谈。
在调查中,医生们一致认为抗生素的过度使用是导致抗生素耐药性产生的一个主要因素(97%),并且他们在决定为自己诊所中患有上呼吸道感染的儿童提供抗生素治疗时应考虑耐药性的选择性压力(83%)。然而,许多报告的行为并不符合最近发表的明智使用抗生素的原则。例如,69%的医生认为脓性鼻炎是鼻窦炎的诊断依据;86%的医生无论咳嗽持续时间长短都为支气管炎开抗生素;42%的医生为普通感冒开抗生素。家庭医生报告的行为更常与已发表的原则不一致:他们比儿科医生更有可能不进行鼓气耳镜检查(46%对25%);不要求有较长时间的症状来诊断鼻窦炎(中位数为4天对10天);不进行咽炎的实验室检查(27%对14%)。在病历审查中分析的7531次诊疗中,43%导致了抗生素处方,包括11%的体检、18%的电话问诊以及72%的上呼吸道感染就诊。25名医生的总体抗生素使用率差异很大(每个孩子每年1至10个疗程)。在一些特定诊断的使用率方面差异甚至更大;尤其是支气管炎和鼻窦炎。抗生素处方率最高的医生的复诊率高出多达30%。为脓性鼻炎开抗生素的医生更有可能见到认为自己孩子的感冒症状应接受评估的家长。
医生认识到抗生素耐药性问题,但他们报告的行为与最近发表的针对大多数儿科上呼吸道感染的建议不一致。儿科医生的实际处方行为往往与其同行有很大不同。患者的观念与他们自己医生的行为相关。