Malgie Jishnu, Wilde Mariëlle I, Brunner-La Rocca Hans-Peter, Emans Mireille E, De Boer Grytsje A, Siegers Charlotte E P, van Stipdonk Antonius M W, Wardeh Alexander J, Schaap Jeroen, Sanders-van Wijk Sandra, van den Heuvel Mieke, Wierda Eric, De Boer Rudolf A, Koudstaal Stefan, Brugts Jasper J
Cardiovascular Institute, Thorax Center, Department of Cardiology, Erasmus MC, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Department of Cardiology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Eur Heart J. 2025 Jul 1;46(25):2394-2405. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehaf244.
Despite guidelines recommending rapid initiation and up-titration of Guideline-recommended medical therapy (GRMT) for heart failure (HF) with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), its feasibility in daily practice remains unclear. TITRATE-HF studies the feasibility of rapid GRMT implementation in de novo HFrEF patients, investigating titration patterns and identifying barriers to effective treatment.
This analysis focuses on the de novo HFrEF patients included in the TITRATE-HF study, an ongoing prospective HF registry conducted in 48 Dutch hospitals. A detailed logbook for each GRMT drug class was recorded, from diagnosis to six months, including initiations, dose adjustments, discontinuations, and reasons for changes.
The study included 1508 de novo HFrEF patients (median age: 70 years [inter-quartile ranges, IQR 62-77]; 31% women; median left ventricular ejection fraction: 30% [IQR 25-35]). At 6 weeks, 46% of patients were using quadruple therapy. Within 6 weeks post-HFrEF diagnosis, 50% of patients were prescribed quadruple therapy at some point, with 84% remaining on it after 180 days. At 6 months, 66.3% of patients were prescribed quadruple therapy, but only 1.3% achieved target doses for all four drug classes. While side effects accounted for 20%-37% of cases where target doses were not reached, a large proportion was attributed to physicians accepting suboptimal doses. Drug titrations occurred frequently in the first 60 days after diagnosis, fading afterwards. Discontinuation rates for angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, angiotensin II receptor blockers, angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitors, beta-blocker, mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists, and sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors were 13%, 11%, 9%, 9%, 11%, and 9%, respectively, primarily due to side effects or intolerances. Rechallenging these drug classes was successful in over 83% of patients.
The TITRATE-HF study demonstrates that rapid initiation of GRMT for HFrEF is feasible in real-world clinical practice. Nonetheless, our results highlight the urgency for a proactive approach and ongoing dose titration of pharmacological therapy beyond the initial first months to fully optimize treatment.
尽管指南推荐对射血分数降低的心力衰竭(HFrEF)患者迅速启动并滴定指南推荐的药物治疗(GRMT),但其在日常实践中的可行性仍不明确。TITRATE-HF研究了在初诊HFrEF患者中迅速实施GRMT的可行性,调查滴定模式并确定有效治疗的障碍。
本分析聚焦于纳入TITRATE-HF研究的初诊HFrEF患者,这是一项正在荷兰48家医院进行的前瞻性心力衰竭登记研究。记录了从诊断到6个月期间每种GRMT药物类别的详细日志,包括起始用药、剂量调整、停药及变更原因。
该研究纳入了1508例初诊HFrEF患者(中位年龄:70岁[四分位间距,IQR 62 - 77];31%为女性;中位左心室射血分数:30%[IQR 25 - 35])。在6周时,46%的患者正在使用四联疗法。在HFrEF诊断后的6周内,50%的患者在某个时间点接受了四联疗法,180天后仍有84%继续使用。在6个月时,66.3%的患者接受了四联疗法,但只有1.3%的患者达到了所有四种药物类别的目标剂量。虽然在未达到目标剂量的病例中,副作用占20% - 37%,但很大一部分原因是医生接受了次优剂量。药物滴定在诊断后的前60天频繁发生,之后逐渐减少。血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂、血管紧张素II受体阻滞剂、血管紧张素受体脑啡肽酶抑制剂、β受体阻滞剂、盐皮质激素受体拮抗剂和钠-葡萄糖协同转运蛋白2抑制剂的停药率分别为13%、11%、9%、9%、11%和9%,主要原因是副作用或不耐受。对这些药物类别进行再次挑战,超过83%的患者取得成功。
TITRATE-HF研究表明,在现实临床实践中,对HFrEF迅速启动GRMT是可行的。尽管如此,我们的结果凸显了采取积极措施以及在最初几个月之后持续进行药物治疗剂量滴定以充分优化治疗的紧迫性。