Schonauer K, Achtergarde D, Suslow T, Michael N
Department of Psychiatry, University of Münster, Albert-Schweitzer-Strasse 11, D-48149 Münster, Germany.
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 1999 Oct;34(10):526-32. doi: 10.1007/s001270050171.
Prelingually deaf persons usually gain only a rudimentary command of speech and prefer sign language to communicate within the deaf community without the handicap they experience in the hearing world. Maintaining social contact within this rather scattered community, however, requires higher degrees of social initiative and mobility. The aim of the present paper was to study the quantity and quality of social integration among a group of prelingually deaf schizophrenic patients (n = 49) and two control groups comprising prelingually deaf psychiatric but non-psychotic patients (n = 38) and hearing schizophrenic patients (n = 30), with account being taken of the special socialisation conditions of deaf persons and of their cultural standards and values.
Data were collected with the help of semi-structured interviews; with the deaf patients these were conducted in German sign language. Using rating procedures we assessed seven social support components, selected items from a history schedule for schizophrenia, and the probands' visual and verbal language skills.
The social networks of the two deaf groups were found to have larger gaps than those of the hearing schizophrenic patients, with significant differences being registered most clearly in the comparison between deaf schizophrenic and hearing schizophrenic patients. Comparison of the verbal and visual language skills of the two deaf groups revealed a substantial deficit among the deaf schizophrenics. Visual language skills were found to correlate more strongly than verbal language skills with the social support components.
Prelingual deafness has a strong impact on the course of schizophrenia. In the long run, many of these patients belong to a "minority within a minority".
语前聋患者通常只能掌握基本的言语能力,在聋人群体中交流时更倾向于使用手语,以避免在听力世界中所面临的障碍。然而,在这个分布较为分散的群体中维持社会联系,需要更高程度的社会主动性和流动性。本文旨在研究一组语前聋精神分裂症患者(n = 49)以及两个对照组(分别为语前聋的非精神病性精神科患者,n = 38;以及听力正常的精神分裂症患者,n = 30)的社会融合数量和质量,同时考虑到聋人的特殊社会化条件及其文化标准和价值观。
借助半结构化访谈收集数据;对于聋患者,访谈采用德国手语进行。我们使用评分程序评估了七个社会支持成分、从精神分裂症病史记录表中选取的项目以及被试的视觉和言语语言技能。
发现两个聋人群体的社会网络比听力正常的精神分裂症患者的社会网络存在更大差距,聋精神分裂症患者与听力正常的精神分裂症患者之间的比较中差异最为明显。对两个聋人群体的言语和视觉语言技能进行比较发现,聋精神分裂症患者存在明显缺陷。结果表明,视觉语言技能与社会支持成分的相关性比言语语言技能更强。
语前聋对精神分裂症的病程有很大影响。从长远来看,这些患者中的许多人属于“少数群体中的少数群体”。