Kalish L A, McKinlay J B
New England Research Institutes, Watertown, Massachusetts 02472, USA.
Urology. 1999 Dec;54(6):1022-7. doi: 10.1016/s0090-4295(99)00349-0.
To investigate the relationship between age and total prostate-specific antigen (tPSA), free PSA (fPSA), and percent free PSA (%fPSA) in men 48 to 79 years old without clinical evidence of prostate cancer. We determined age-specific ranges for each parameter and compared the results with previously published studies in similar populations.
Nine hundred eighty-three men (96% white) from the random-sample community-based Massachusetts Male Aging Study were analyzed. Men with PSA 4.1 ng/mL or greater were referred for biopsy and those with positive biopsies or with medical record, cancer registry, or self-reported evidence of prostate cancer were excluded.
The median tPSA increased 38.6% per decade (95% confidence interval 28.7% to 49.3%). Because of the greater variability at older ages, the 95th percentile increased faster than the median, leading to the following age-specific upper limits of normal: 2.84 for 50 to 59 years, 5.87 for 60 to 69 years, and 9.03 for 70 to 79 years. The pattern of association between fPSA and age was similar to tPSA. The 50th and 5th percentiles of %fPSA were 25.3% and 13.2%, respectively, regardless of age.
Establishing age-specific screening cutoffs based on the age-specific upper limits of normal will ensure low false-positive biopsy rates but may also lead to low true positive rates (ie, low sensitivity) in older age groups. Both sensitivity and specificity should be considered when counseling patients. The independence of %fPSA with age confirms others' findings.
研究48至79岁无前列腺癌临床证据男性的年龄与总前列腺特异性抗原(tPSA)、游离PSA(fPSA)及游离PSA百分比(%fPSA)之间的关系。我们确定了各参数的年龄特异性范围,并将结果与先前在类似人群中发表的研究进行比较。
对来自基于社区随机抽样的马萨诸塞男性衰老研究的983名男性(96%为白人)进行分析。PSA为4.1 ng/mL或更高的男性被转诊进行活检,活检阳性或有病历、癌症登记或自我报告的前列腺癌证据的男性被排除。
tPSA中位数每十年增加38.6%(95%置信区间28.7%至49.3%)。由于老年时变异性更大,第95百分位数的增长速度快于中位数,导致以下年龄特异性正常上限:50至59岁为2.84,60至69岁为5.87,70至79岁为9.03。fPSA与年龄之间的关联模式与tPSA相似。无论年龄如何,%fPSA的第50百分位数和第5百分位数分别为25.3%和13.2%。
根据年龄特异性正常上限建立年龄特异性筛查临界值将确保低假阳性活检率,但也可能导致老年组真阳性率低(即低敏感性)。在为患者提供咨询时应同时考虑敏感性和特异性。%fPSA与年龄的独立性证实了其他人的研究结果。