Suppr超能文献

一种用于确定衰弱指数临界点以定义衰弱类别的替代方法。

An alternative method for Frailty Index cut-off points to define frailty categories.

作者信息

Romero-Ortuno Roman

机构信息

Department of Medical Gerontology, Trinity College Dublin, Old Stone Building, Trinity Centre for Health Sciences, St James's Hospital, James's Street, Dublin 8, Ireland, .

出版信息

Eur Geriatr Med. 2013 Nov 1;4(5). doi: 10.1016/j.eurger.2013.06.005.

Abstract

PURPOSE

the Frailty Index (FI) is a popular operationalization of frailty. FI cut-off points have been proposed to define, regardless of age, frailty categories with increasing risk. Here, an alternative method is described that takes age into account.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

29,905 participants aged ≥ 50 from the first wave of the Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe. The mean follow-up for mortality was 2.4 years. Curve estimation procedures were carried out between age and a FI, and 50% Confidence Intervals (CI) for the regression mean were derived. As opposed to the usual method (FI ≤ 0.08: non-frail; FI ≥ 0.25: frail; rest: pre-frail), the alternative method defines as 'fit for their age' those with a FI below the lower 50% CI; 'frail for their age' those with a FI above the upper 50% CI; the rest as 'average for their age'. Using both methods, the prevalence of the frailty categories and their associated mortality rates were compared for each age group.

RESULTS

The best fit between age the FI was by cubic regression ( = 0.174, < 0.001). Among those in their 50s, 5% were frail by the usual method (mortality: 5%) and 14% by the alternative (mortality: 2%). Among those in their 90s, 64% were frail by the usual method (mortality: 43%) and 41% by the alternative (mortality: 48%).

CONCLUSION

the alternative method may be more sensitive in younger ages and more specific in older ages. This may have implications for population screening.

摘要

目的

衰弱指数(FI)是一种常用的衰弱量化指标。已有人提出FI的截断点,用于定义无论年龄大小、风险递增的衰弱类别。在此,描述了一种将年龄因素考虑在内的替代方法。

对象与方法

来自欧洲健康、老龄化与退休调查第一轮的29905名年龄≥50岁的参与者。死亡率的平均随访时间为2.4年。对年龄与FI进行曲线估计程序,并得出回归均值的50%置信区间(CI)。与常规方法(FI≤0.08:非衰弱;FI≥0.25:衰弱;其余:前期衰弱)不同,替代方法将FI低于下50%CI的人定义为“与其年龄相符的健康者”;FI高于上50%CI的人定义为“与其年龄不符的衰弱者”;其余的定义为“与其年龄相符的中等者”。使用这两种方法,比较了各年龄组衰弱类别的患病率及其相关死亡率。

结果

年龄与FI之间的最佳拟合为三次回归( = 0.174,<0.001)。在50多岁的人群中,按照常规方法5%的人衰弱(死亡率:5%),按照替代方法14%的人衰弱(死亡率:2%)。在90多岁的人群中,按照常规方法64%的人衰弱(死亡率:43%),按照替代方法41%的人衰弱(死亡率:48%)。

结论

替代方法在年轻年龄段可能更敏感,在老年年龄段可能更具特异性。这可能对人群筛查有影响。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

2
Frailty in elderly people.老年人虚弱。
Lancet. 2013 Mar 2;381(9868):752-62. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)62167-9. Epub 2013 Feb 8.
4
Frailty and its quantitative clinical evaluation.衰弱及其定量临床评估。
J R Coll Physicians Edinb. 2012;42(4):333-40. doi: 10.4997/JRCPE.2012.412.
8
Population ageing and health.人口老龄化与健康。
Lancet. 2012 Apr 7;379(9823):1295-6. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60519-4. Epub 2012 Apr 4.
9
Frailty transitions in the San Antonio Longitudinal Study of Aging.衰老的圣安东尼奥纵向研究中的脆弱性转变。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2012 Apr;60(4):652-60. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2011.03882.x. Epub 2012 Feb 8.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验