Chen J, de Chillou C, Basiouny T, Sadoul N, Filho J D, Magnin-Poull I, Messier M, Aliot E
Service de Cardiologie, Hôpital Central, Nancy, France.
Circulation. 1999;100(25):2507-13. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.100.25.2507.
We sought to compare published methods to an alternative approach ascertaining cavotricuspid isthmus (CTI) block during atrial flutter ablation.
In 39 consecutive patients who underwent an atrial flutter ablation procedure, a 24-pole mapping catheter was positioned so that 2 adjacent dipoles were bracketing the targeted CTI line of block (LOB), with proximal dipoles lateral to the LOB and distal dipoles in the coronary sinus. Two pacing sites were lateral (positions A and B) and 2 were septal (positions C and D) to the LOB, with locations A and D closest to the LOB. A resulting CTI block was accepted when 3 criteria were fulfilled: (1) complete reversal of the right atrial depolarization on the 24-pole catheter when pacing in the coronary sinus, (2) conduction delays from A to D greater than from B to D, and (3) conduction delays from D to A greater than from C to A. A successful CTI block was obtained in all patients. Before CTI block was obtained, a progressive CTI conduction delay was observed in 11 patients (28.2%). During the procedure, the 3 criteria defined above were either all present or all absent.
This study establishes that reversal of the atrial depolarization sequence up to the LOB is a definitive and mandatory criteria of successful atrial flutter ablation.
我们试图将已发表的方法与在心房颤动消融期间确定腔静脉三尖瓣峡部(CTI)阻滞的另一种方法进行比较。
在39例连续接受心房颤动消融手术的患者中,将一根24极标测导管放置在这样的位置,即两个相邻的偶极包围目标CTI阻滞线(LOB),近端偶极位于LOB外侧,远端偶极位于冠状窦内。两个起搏部位在LOB外侧(A和B位置),两个在LOB间隔侧(C和D位置),A和D位置最靠近LOB。当满足以下三个标准时,判定为CTI阻滞:(1)在冠状窦起搏时,24极导管上右心房去极化完全逆转;(2)从A到D的传导延迟大于从B到D的传导延迟;(3)从D到A的传导延迟大于从C到A的传导延迟。所有患者均成功获得CTI阻滞。在获得CTI阻滞之前,11例患者(28.2%)观察到CTI传导延迟逐渐增加。在手术过程中,上述三个标准要么全部存在,要么全部不存在。
本研究证实,直至LOB的心房去极化序列逆转是成功进行心房颤动消融的决定性和必要标准。