Monk T H, Petrie S R, Hayes A J, Kupfer D J
Sleep and Chronobiology Center, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, USA.
J Sleep Res. 1994 Dec;3(4):196-205. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2869.1994.tb00132.x.
A diary-like instrument to measure lifestyle regularity (the 'Social Rhythm Metric'-SRM) was given to 96 subjects (48 women, 48 men), 39 of whom repeated the study after at least one year, with additional objective measures of rest/activity. Lifestyle regularity as measured by the SRM related to age, morningness, subjective sleep quality and time-of-day variations in alertness, but not to gender, extroversion or neuroticism. Statistically significant test-retest correlations of about 0.4 emerged for SRM scores over the 12-30 month delay. Diary-based estimates of bedtime and waketime appeared fairly reliable. In a further study of healthy young men, 4 high SRM scorers ('regular') had a deeper nocturnal body temperature trough than 5 low SRM scorers ('irregular'), suggesting a better functioning circadian system in the 'regular' group.
一种用于测量生活方式规律性的日记式工具(“社会节律指标” - SRM)被分发给96名受试者(48名女性,48名男性),其中39人在至少一年后重复了该研究,并增加了休息/活动的客观测量。通过SRM测量的生活方式规律性与年龄、晨型、主观睡眠质量以及一天中不同时间的警觉性变化有关,但与性别、外向性或神经质无关。在12 - 30个月的延迟期内,SRM得分出现了约0.4的具有统计学意义的重测相关性。基于日记的就寝时间和起床时间估计似乎相当可靠。在对健康年轻男性的进一步研究中,4名SRM得分高的受试者(“规律组”)夜间体温低谷比5名SRM得分低的受试者(“不规律组”)更深,这表明“规律组”的昼夜节律系统功能更好。