• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

选择一种低温灭菌技术。

Choosing a low-temperature sterilization technology.

出版信息

Health Devices. 1999 Nov;28(11):430-55.

PMID:10609148
Abstract

Low-temperature sterilization technologies are used instead of steam for sterilizing heat-sensitive or moisture-intolerant surgical equipment and supplies. In this Guidance Article, we describe several common alternatives, but we focus specifically on the two that have generated the most interest in recent years: ethylene oxide (EtO) and gas plasma sterilization. Ethylene oxide has been used as a low-temperature sterilization technology since the 1950s. Although EtO can be used safely, exposure to this gas is known to be a health hazard, and the emissions from certain EtO sterilizers are known to pollute the atmosphere. For these reasons, the use of EtO is regulated--more strictly in some regions than in others--and many healthcare facilities have decided to investigate alternative technologies. Gas plasma sterilization emerged in the 1990s as one promising alternative. This method appears to pose fewer health and environmental risks, and it offers faster turnaround times. However, this technology also has some limitations. We describe the advantages and disadvantages of both methods, along with the factors to consider when selecting from among these alternatives, in this Guidance Article.

摘要

低温灭菌技术用于替代蒸汽,对热敏或不耐湿的手术设备及用品进行灭菌。在本指导文章中,我们描述了几种常见的替代方法,但特别关注近年来最受关注的两种方法:环氧乙烷(EtO)和气体等离子体灭菌。自20世纪50年代以来,环氧乙烷一直被用作低温灭菌技术。虽然EtO可以安全使用,但已知接触这种气体会对健康有害,并且某些EtO灭菌器的排放物会污染大气。由于这些原因,EtO的使用受到监管——在一些地区比其他地区更严格——许多医疗机构已决定研究替代技术。气体等离子体灭菌在20世纪90年代出现,是一种有前景的替代方法。这种方法似乎对健康和环境造成的风险较小,并且周转时间更快。然而,这项技术也有一些局限性。在本指导文章中,我们描述了这两种方法的优缺点,以及从这些替代方法中进行选择时需要考虑的因素。

相似文献

1
Choosing a low-temperature sterilization technology.选择一种低温灭菌技术。
Health Devices. 1999 Nov;28(11):430-55.
2
Ethylene oxide sterilization: how hospitals can adapt to the changes.环氧乙烷灭菌:医院如何适应这些变化。
Health Devices. 1994 Dec;23(12):485-92.
3
Comparison of ion plasma, vaporized hydrogen peroxide, and 100% ethylene oxide sterilizers to the 12/88 ethylene oxide gas sterilizer.离子等离子体、汽化过氧化氢和100%环氧乙烷灭菌器与12/88环氧乙烷气体灭菌器的比较。
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 1996 Feb;17(2):92-100. doi: 10.1086/647252.
4
Cost analysis of three low-temperature sterilization systems at Saint Barnabas Medical Center.圣巴拿巴医疗中心三种低温灭菌系统的成本分析。
J Healthc Mater Manage. 1994 Aug;12(8):29, 32-4.
5
Parametric release for EtO sterilization.环氧乙烷灭菌的参数放行
Med Device Technol. 1998 Jul-Aug;9(6):22-6.
6
Steam sterilization: a suitable alternative?蒸汽灭菌:一种合适的替代方法?
Med Device Technol. 1992 Jun-Jul;3(5):45-7.
7
Low-temperature sterilization using gas plasmas.使用气体等离子体进行低温灭菌。
Med Device Technol. 1993 May;4(4):37-40.
8
Evaluating the formulae for integrated lethality in ethylene oxide sterilization using six different endospore forming strains of bacteria, and comparisons of integrated lethality for ethylene oxide and steam systems.使用六种不同的产芽孢细菌菌株评估环氧乙烷灭菌中综合致死率的公式,并比较环氧乙烷和蒸汽系统的综合致死率。
PDA J Pharm Sci Technol. 2005 Jan-Feb;59(1):64-86.
9
Ethylene oxide dispersion from gas sterilizers.气体灭菌器中环氧乙烷的扩散
Am Ind Hyg Assoc J. 1983 Aug;44(8):589-91. doi: 10.1080/15298668391405373.
10
Costs of low-temperature plasma sterilization compared with other sterilization methods.低温等离子体灭菌与其他灭菌方法的成本比较。
J Hosp Infect. 1998 Oct;40(2):125-34. doi: 10.1016/s0195-6701(98)90091-3.