Suppr超能文献

计算机与纸笔作业的比较。

A comparison of a computer and pencil and paper assignment.

作者信息

Gibbons C, Bachulis A, Allen G

机构信息

College of Nursing, Michigan State University, East Lansing 48824, USA.

出版信息

Comput Nurs. 1999 Nov-Dec;17(6):286-90.

Abstract

Colleges are challenged to provide students with diverse teaching-learning experiences. Educators who introduce new teaching-learning experiences must evaluate the outcomes of these experiences. Three faculty members instituted a new multimedia computer-based assignment for undergraduate nursing students enrolled in a pediatric clinical course and then evaluated their knowledge and satisfaction. Students were asked to design a computer program about peripherally inserted central catheters, and to complete tests and summaries. During two semesters, 45 students participated in the assignment. As compared to another group of students who were asked to participate in a pencil and paper independent study assignment, these students were more satisfied with their computer assignment. Students in both groups, however, produced thought-provoking work and improved their knowledge base about central catheters. In many ways, the results support the use of a computer assignment.

摘要

各学院面临着为学生提供多样化教学体验的挑战。引入新教学体验的教育工作者必须评估这些体验的效果。三名教员为参加儿科临床课程的本科护理学生设置了一项基于多媒体计算机的新作业,然后评估了他们的知识掌握情况和满意度。学生们被要求设计一个关于外周静脉穿刺中心静脉导管的计算机程序,并完成测试和总结。在两个学期中,45名学生参与了这项作业。与另一组被要求参加纸笔独立学习作业的学生相比,这些学生对他们的计算机作业更满意。然而,两组学生都完成了发人深省的作业,并增进了他们关于中心静脉导管的知识基础。从很多方面来看,这些结果都支持采用计算机作业。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验