Williams C M, Francis-Knapper J A, Webb D, Brookes C A, Zampelas A, Tredger J A, Wright J, Meijer G, Calder P C, Yaqoob P, Roche H, Gibney M J
Hugh Sinclair Unit of Human Nutrition, Department of Food Science and Technology, University of Reading, UK.
Br J Nutr. 1999 Jun;81(6):439-46.
In two separate studies, the cholesterol-lowering efficacy of a diet high in monounsaturated fatty acids (MUFA) was evaluated by means of a randomized crossover trial. In both studies subjects were randomized to receive either a high-MUFA diet or the control diet first, which they followed for a period of 8 weeks; following a washout period of 4-6 weeks they were transferred onto the opposing diet for a further period of 8 weeks. In one study subjects were healthy middle-aged men (n 30), and in the other they were young men (n 23) with a family history of CHD recruited from two centres (Guildford and Dublin). The two studies were conducted over the same time period using identical foods and study designs. Subjects consumed 38% energy as fat, with 18% energy as MUFA and 10% as saturated fatty acids (MUFA diet), or 13% energy as MUFA and 16% as saturated fatty acids (control diet). The polyunsaturated fatty acid content of each diet was 7%. The diets were achieved by providing subjects with manufactured foods such as spreads, 'ready meals', biscuits, puddings and breads, which, apart from their fatty acid compositions, were identical for both diets. Subjects were blind to which of the diets they were following on both arms of the study. Weight changes on the diets were less than 1 kg. In the groups combined (n 53) mean total and LDL-cholesterol levels were significantly lower at the end of the MUFA diet than the control diet by 0.29 (SD 0.61) mmol/l (P < 0.001) and 0.38 (SD 0.64) mmol/l (P < 0.0001) respectively. In middle-aged men these differences were due to a mean reduction in LDL-cholesterol of -11 (SD 12)% on the MUFA diet with no change on the control diet (-1.1 (SD 10)%). In young men the differences were due to an increase in LDL-cholesterol concentration on the control diet of +6.2 (SD 13)% and a decrease on the MUFA diet of -7.8 (SD 20)%. Differences in the responses of middle-aged and young men to the two diets did not appear to be due to differences in their habitual baseline diets which were generally similar, but appeared to reflect the lower baseline cholesterol concentrations in the younger men. There was a moderately strong and statistically significant inverse correlation between the change in LDL-cholesterol concentration on each diet and the baseline fasting LDL-cholesterol concentration (r -0.49; P < 0.0005). In conclusion, diets in which saturated fat is partially replaced by MUFA can achieve significant reductions in total and LDL-cholesterol concentrations, even when total fat and energy intakes are maintained. The dietary approach used to alter fatty acid intakes would be appropriate for achieving reductions in saturated fat intakes in whole populations.
在两项独立研究中,通过随机交叉试验评估了富含单不饱和脂肪酸(MUFA)的饮食降低胆固醇的功效。在两项研究中,受试者均被随机分配,先接受高MUFA饮食或对照饮食,为期8周;经过4 - 6周的洗脱期后,他们再转为食用另一种饮食,为期8周。一项研究的受试者是健康的中年男性(n = 30),另一项研究的受试者是来自两个中心(吉尔福德和都柏林)的有冠心病家族史的年轻男性(n = 23)。两项研究在同一时间段内使用相同的食物和研究设计。受试者摄入的脂肪提供38%的能量,其中18%的能量来自MUFA,10%来自饱和脂肪酸(MUFA饮食),或者13%的能量来自MUFA,16%来自饱和脂肪酸(对照饮食)。每种饮食的多不饱和脂肪酸含量均为7%。通过为受试者提供诸如涂抹酱、“即食餐”、饼干、布丁和面包等加工食品来实现这些饮食,除了脂肪酸组成不同外,两种饮食的这些食品完全相同。在研究的两个阶段,受试者均不知道自己食用的是哪种饮食。饮食期间体重变化小于1千克。在合并的组(n = 53)中,MUFA饮食结束时的平均总胆固醇和低密度脂蛋白胆固醇水平显著低于对照饮食,分别低0.29(标准差0.61)mmol/L(P < 0.001)和0.38(标准差0.64)mmol/L(P < 0.0001)。在中年男性中,这些差异是由于MUFA饮食使低密度脂蛋白胆固醇平均降低了-11(标准差12)%,而对照饮食无变化(-1.1(标准差10)%)。在年轻男性中,差异是由于对照饮食使低密度脂蛋白胆固醇浓度升高了+6.2(标准差13)%,而MUFA饮食使其降低了-7.8(标准差20)%。中年男性和年轻男性对两种饮食反应的差异似乎并非由于他们通常相似的习惯性基线饮食不同,而是似乎反映了年轻男性较低的基线胆固醇浓度。每种饮食中低密度脂蛋白胆固醇浓度的变化与基线空腹低密度脂蛋白胆固醇浓度之间存在中等强度且具有统计学意义的负相关(r = -0.49;P < 0.0005)。总之,即使总脂肪和能量摄入量保持不变,用MUFA部分替代饱和脂肪的饮食也能显著降低总胆固醇和低密度脂蛋白胆固醇浓度。用于改变脂肪酸摄入量的饮食方法适用于在整个人口中降低饱和脂肪的摄入量。