• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

场景处理与面部处理之间不同的时间进程:一项脑磁图研究。

Different time course between scene processing and face processing: a MEG study.

作者信息

Sato N, Nakamura K, Nakamura A, Sugiura M, Ito K, Fukuda H, Kawashima R

机构信息

Department of Behavioral and Brain Sciences, Primate Research Institute, Kyoto University, Inuyama, Aichi, Japan.

出版信息

Neuroreport. 1999 Nov 26;10(17):3633-7. doi: 10.1097/00001756-199911260-00031.

DOI:10.1097/00001756-199911260-00031
PMID:10619657
Abstract

Using magnetoencephalography (MEG), the neural response to scenes was recorded and compared with that to faces. The prominent MEG signals in response to scenes appeared 200-300 ms after the stimulus presentation while those in response to faces appeared between 150 and 200 ms. Source locations of the signals were estimated in the right parahippocampal and parieto-occipital regions with a latency of 300 ms for the scene response, whereas those were estimated in the lingual or fusiform gyri bilaterally with a latency of 160 ms for the face response. These data suggest that both the temporal and parietal regions process scenes, while the occipito-temporal regions process faces, and that scene processing takes a longer time than face processing.

摘要

利用脑磁图(MEG)记录了对场景的神经反应,并将其与对面孔的神经反应进行了比较。对场景做出反应的显著MEG信号在刺激呈现后200 - 300毫秒出现,而对面孔做出反应的信号在150至200毫秒之间出现。信号的源位置在右侧海马旁回和顶枕区域估计,场景反应的潜伏期为300毫秒,而对面孔反应的信号源位置在双侧舌回或梭状回估计,潜伏期为160毫秒。这些数据表明,颞叶和顶叶区域都处理场景,而枕颞区域处理面孔,并且场景处理比面孔处理需要更长的时间。

相似文献

1
Different time course between scene processing and face processing: a MEG study.场景处理与面部处理之间不同的时间进程:一项脑磁图研究。
Neuroreport. 1999 Nov 26;10(17):3633-7. doi: 10.1097/00001756-199911260-00031.
2
Time course of gamma-band oscillation associated with face processing in the inferior occipital gyrus and fusiform gyrus: A combined fMRI and MEG study.枕下回和梭状回中与面部加工相关的伽马波段振荡的时间进程:一项功能磁共振成像和脑磁图的联合研究。
Hum Brain Mapp. 2017 Apr;38(4):2067-2079. doi: 10.1002/hbm.23505. Epub 2016 Dec 28.
3
Cortical correlates of face and scene inversion: a comparison.面部与场景倒置的皮层关联:一项比较
Neuropsychologia. 2006;44(7):1145-58. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2005.10.009. Epub 2005 Nov 21.
4
Cognitive response profile of the human fusiform face area as determined by MEG.通过脑磁图测定的人类梭状回面孔区的认知反应特征。
Cereb Cortex. 2000 Jan;10(1):69-81. doi: 10.1093/cercor/10.1.69.
5
Functional delineation of the human occipito-temporal areas related to face and scene processing. A PET study.与面部和场景处理相关的人类枕颞叶区域的功能划分:一项正电子发射断层扫描研究。
Brain. 2000 Sep;123 ( Pt 9):1903-12. doi: 10.1093/brain/123.9.1903.
6
Regulation of brain activity in the fusiform face and parahippocampal place areas in 7-11-year-old children.7-11 岁儿童梭状回面孔区和旁海马回位置区的大脑活动调节。
Brain Cogn. 2013 Mar;81(2):203-14. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2012.11.003. Epub 2012 Dec 20.
7
Parametric design and correlational analyses help integrating fMRI and electrophysiological data during face processing.参数设计和相关分析有助于在面部处理过程中整合功能磁共振成像(fMRI)和电生理数据。
Neuroimage. 2004 Aug;22(4):1587-95. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.04.018.
8
Dominance of the left oblique view in activating the cortical network for face recognition.左斜视图在激活用于人脸识别的皮质网络中的主导作用。
Neurosci Res. 2004 Dec;50(4):475-80. doi: 10.1016/j.neures.2004.08.014.
9
Common cortical responses evoked by appearance, disappearance and change of the human face.由人脸的出现、消失和变化引发的常见皮层反应。
BMC Neurosci. 2009 Apr 24;10:38. doi: 10.1186/1471-2202-10-38.
10
Spatiotemporal dynamics of similarity-based neural representations of facial identity.基于相似度的面部身份神经表征的时空动态
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017 Jan 10;114(2):388-393. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1614763114. Epub 2016 Dec 27.

引用本文的文献

1
Timing of Allocentric and Egocentric Spatial Processing in Human Intracranial EEG.人类颅内 EEG 中的非自我中心和自我中心空间处理的时间。
Brain Topogr. 2023 Nov;36(6):870-889. doi: 10.1007/s10548-023-00989-2. Epub 2023 Jul 21.
2
Spring Break or Heart Break? Extending Valence Bias to Emotional Words.春假还是心碎?将效价偏差扩展至情感词汇。
Soc Psychol Personal Sci. 2021 Sep 1;12(7):1392-1401. doi: 10.1177/1948550620972296. Epub 2020 Nov 18.
3
Mapping the Scene and Object Processing Networks by Intracranial EEG.通过颅内脑电图绘制场景和物体处理网络
Front Hum Neurosci. 2020 Oct 9;14:561399. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2020.561399. eCollection 2020.
4
Cortical sensitivity to natural scene structure.皮层对自然场景结构的敏感性。
Hum Brain Mapp. 2020 Apr 1;41(5):1286-1295. doi: 10.1002/hbm.24875. Epub 2019 Nov 22.
5
Spatial frequency supports the emergence of categorical representations in visual cortex during natural scene perception.空间频率在自然场景感知过程中支持视觉皮层中类别表示的出现。
Neuroimage. 2018 Oct 1;179:102-116. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.06.033. Epub 2018 Jun 11.
6
Differences in Brain Hemodynamics in Response to Achromatic and Chromatic Cards of the Rorschach: A fMRI Study.对罗夏测验中消色差和彩色卡片反应的脑血流动力学差异:一项功能磁共振成像研究
Rorschachiana. 2016;37(1):41-57. doi: 10.1027/1192-5604/a000076. Epub 2016 Jun 10.
7
The Temporal Dynamics of Scene Processing: A Multifaceted EEG Investigation.场景处理的时间动态:一项多方面的 EEG 研究。
eNeuro. 2016 Sep 27;3(5). doi: 10.1523/ENEURO.0139-16.2016. eCollection 2016 Sep-Oct.
8
Dynamic functional connectivity shapes individual differences in associative learning.动态功能连接塑造了联想学习中的个体差异。
Hum Brain Mapp. 2016 Nov;37(11):3911-3928. doi: 10.1002/hbm.23285.
9
Different hemispheric roles in recognition of happy expressions.大脑不同半球在识别快乐表情中的作用。
PLoS One. 2014 Feb 10;9(2):e88628. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0088628. eCollection 2014.
10
Different cortical dynamics in face and body perception: an MEG study.面孔和身体知觉的不同皮质动力学:一项 MEG 研究。
PLoS One. 2013 Sep 6;8(9):e71408. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0071408. eCollection 2013.