Suppr超能文献

在一个郊区急诊科采用非正式分诊系统,对全科医生与常规医疗护理进行的随机对照试验。

Randomized controlled trial of general practitioner versus usual medical care in a suburban accident and emergency department using an informal triage system.

作者信息

Gibney D, Murphy A W, Barton D, Byrne C, Smith M, Bury G, Mullan E, Plunkett P K

机构信息

Department of General Practice, University College Dublin, Republic of Ireland.

出版信息

Br J Gen Pract. 1999 Jan;49(438):43-4.

Abstract

We determined if care provided by general practitioners (GPs) to non-emergency patients, in a suburban accident and emergency (A&E) department using an informal triage system, differs significantly from care provided by usual A&E staff. One thousand eight hundred and seventy-eight patients participated. By comparison with usual A&E staff, GPs prescribed significantly more often (percentage relative difference [% RD] = 12 [95% confidence interval = 1-23]) and referred more patients to hospital (% RD = 21 [95% CI = 9-33]). This is the first study to report that sessional GPs working in an A&E department utilize similar or more resources than usual A&E staff. It emphasizes the need for the continued audit of initiatives that have been introduced into new settings.

摘要

我们判定,在一个郊区事故与急救(A&E)部门,全科医生(GPs)使用非正式分诊系统为非急诊患者提供的护理,是否与A&E部门常规工作人员提供的护理存在显著差异。1878名患者参与了研究。与A&E部门常规工作人员相比,全科医生开处方的频率显著更高(相对差异百分比[%RD] = 12 [95%置信区间= 1-23]),且转诊到医院的患者更多(%RD = 21 [95%CI = 9-33])。这是第一项报告在A&E部门工作的兼职全科医生比A&E部门常规工作人员使用相似或更多资源的研究。它强调了对引入新环境的举措进行持续审计的必要性。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验