Skrandies W, Jedynak A
School of Medicine, Justus-Liebig University, Giessen, Germany.
Behav Brain Res. 2000 Jan;107(1-2):1-8. doi: 10.1016/s0166-4328(99)00096-0.
A classical conditioning paradigm was employed in two experiments performed on 35 human volunteers. In nine subjects, the presentation of Landolt rings (conditioned stimuli, CS + ) was paired with an electric stimulus (unconditioned stimuli, UCS) applied to the left median nerve. Neutral visual control stimuli were full circles (CS -) that were not paired with the UCS. The skin conductance response (SCR) was determined in a time interval of 5 s after onset of the visual stimuli, and it was measured in the acquisition and test phase. Associative learning was reflected by a SCR occurring selectively with CS +. The same experiment was repeated with another group of 26 adults while electroencephalogram (EEG) was recorded from 30 electrodes. For each subject, mean evoked potentials were computed. In 13 of the subjects, a conditioning paradigm was followed while the other subjects served as the control group (non-contingent stimulation). There were somatosensory and visual brain activity evoked by the stimuli. Conditioned components were identified by computing cross-correlation between evoked somatosensory components and the averaged EEG. In the visual evoked brain activity, three components with mean latencies of 105.4, 183.2, and 360.3 ms were analyzed. Somatosensory stimuli were followed by major components that occurred at mean latencies of 48.8, 132.5, 219.7, 294.8, and 374.2 ms latency after the shock. All components were analyzed in terms of latency, field strength, and topographic characteristics, and were compared between groups and experimental conditions. Both visual and somatosensory brain activity was significantly affected by classical conditioning. Our data illustrate how associative learning affects the topography of brain electrical activity elicited by presentation of conditioned visual stimuli.
在对35名人类志愿者进行的两项实验中采用了经典条件反射范式。在9名受试者中,呈现兰多尔特环(条件刺激,CS +)与施加于左正中神经的电刺激(非条件刺激,UCS)配对。中性视觉对照刺激是未与UCS配对的完整圆圈(CS -)。在视觉刺激开始后的5秒时间间隔内测定皮肤电导反应(SCR),并在习得阶段和测试阶段进行测量。条件性学习通过仅在CS +出现时发生的SCR反映出来。在另一组26名成年人中重复了相同的实验,同时从30个电极记录脑电图(EEG)。对每个受试者计算平均诱发电位。在13名受试者中遵循条件反射范式,而其他受试者作为对照组(非偶然刺激)。刺激引发了体感和视觉脑活动。通过计算诱发的体感成分与平均EEG之间的互相关来识别条件成分。在视觉诱发的脑活动中,分析了平均潜伏期为105.4、183.2和360.3毫秒的三个成分。体感刺激之后是主要成分,其在电击后平均潜伏期为48.8、132.5、219.7、294.8和374.2毫秒时出现。对所有成分进行潜伏期、场强和地形特征分析,并在组间和实验条件之间进行比较。经典条件反射显著影响视觉和体感脑活动。我们的数据说明了联想学习如何影响由条件性视觉刺激呈现所引发的脑电活动的地形。