Ridley D T
J Med Ethics. 1999 Dec;25(6):469-72. doi: 10.1136/jme.25.6.469.
Jehovah's Witnesses are students of the Bible. They refuse transfusions out of obedience to the scriptural directive to abstain and keep from blood. Dr Muramoto disagrees with the Witnesses' religious beliefs in this regard. Despite this basic disagreement over the meaning of Biblical texts, Muramoto flouts the religious basis for the Witnesses' position. His proposed policy change about accepting transfusions in private not only conflicts with the Witnesses' fundamental beliefs but it promotes hypocrisy. In addition, Muramoto's arguments about pressure to conform and coerced disclosure of private information misrepresent the beliefs and practices of Jehovah's Witnesses and ignore the element of individual conscience. In short, Muramoto resorts to distortion and uncorroborated assertions in his effort to portray a matter of religious faith as a matter of medical ethical debate.
耶和华见证人是《圣经》的研读者。他们出于服从圣经中关于戒除和远离血液的指示而拒绝输血。村本医生在这方面不同意见证人的宗教信仰。尽管在圣经经文的含义上存在这种基本分歧,但村本无视见证人立场的宗教基础。他提议的私下接受输血的政策改变不仅与见证人的基本信仰相冲突,而且还助长了虚伪。此外,村本关于从众压力和强迫披露私人信息的论点歪曲了耶和华见证人的信仰和做法,忽视了个人良知的因素。简而言之,村本为了将宗教信仰问题描绘成医学伦理辩论问题而诉诸歪曲和未经证实的断言。