Jin K, Sorock G S, Courtney T, Liang Y, Yao Z, Matz S, Ge L
Liberty Mutual Research for Safety and Health, 71 Frankland Road, Hopkinton, MA 01748-1298, USA.
Int J Occup Environ Health. 2000 Jan-Mar;6(1):26-33. doi: 10.1179/oeh.2000.6.1.26.
A critical review was conducted of studies of work-related low back pain in the People's Republic of China. The published literature in both the English and Chinese languages from 1983 to 1997 was reviewed for studies that permitted the calculation of prevalence ratios. Thirty-five papers were identified initially, and after quality inclusion/exclusion criteria were applied, 16 (14 in Chinese and two in English) were selected for more detailed review. Prevalence ratios were statistically elevated in all but two of the selected studies. Prevalence ratios for individual groups ranged from 2.0 to 8.5 for bending and twisting, 1.5 to 14.3 for static posture, 1.9 to 5.5 for whole-body vibration, and 2.6 to 9.4 for low-temperature exposure. The literature was limited by the absence of standardized and robust measures of low-back-pain outcomes and exposures and by the omission of fundamental details from research reports. Even with these limitations, the review findings suggest that three physical risk factors, all well known in the international literature, are associated with the prevalence of low back pain in the People's Republic of China.
对中华人民共和国与工作相关的腰痛研究进行了批判性综述。对1983年至1997年期间以英文和中文发表的文献进行了回顾,以寻找可用于计算患病率比值的研究。最初确定了35篇论文,在应用质量纳入/排除标准后,选择了16篇(14篇中文和2篇英文)进行更详细的综述。在所选研究中,除两项研究外,所有研究的患病率比值在统计学上均有所升高。各个组的患病率比值范围为:弯腰和扭转时为2.0至8.5,静态姿势时为1.5至14.3,全身振动时为1.9至5.5,低温暴露时为2.6至9.4。该文献受到腰痛结果和暴露的标准化和可靠测量方法的缺乏以及研究报告中基本细节遗漏的限制。即使存在这些局限性,综述结果表明,国际文献中熟知的三个身体风险因素与中华人民共和国腰痛的患病率相关。