McBride David, Paulin Sara, Herbison G Peter, Waite David, Bagheri Nasser
a Department of Preventive and Social Medicine , University of Otago , Dunedin , New Zealand.
Arch Environ Occup Health. 2014;69(4):207-13. doi: 10.1080/19338244.2013.771246.
The objective of this study was to determine the prevalence and excess risk of low back pain and neck pain in locomotive engineers, and to investigate the relationship of both with whole-body vibration exposure. A cross-sectional survey comparing locomotive engineers with other rail worker referents was conducted. Current vibration levels were measured, cumulative exposures calculated for engineers and referents, and low back and neck pain assessed by a self-completed questionnaire. Median vibration exposure in the z- (vertical) axis was 0.62 m/s(2). Engineers experienced more frequent low back and neck pain, odds ratios (ORs) of 1.77 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.19-2.64) and 1.92 (95% CI: 1.22-3.02), respectively. The authors conclude that vibration close to the "action levels" of published standards contribute to low back and neck pain. Vibration levels need to be assessed conservatively and control measures introduced.
本研究的目的是确定机车工程师中腰背痛和颈痛的患病率及额外风险,并调查二者与全身振动暴露之间的关系。开展了一项横断面调查,将机车工程师与其他铁路工人对照进行比较。测量了当前的振动水平,计算了工程师和对照的累积暴露量,并通过一份自我填写的问卷评估了腰背痛和颈痛情况。z轴(垂直方向)的振动暴露中位数为0.62米/秒²。工程师经历腰背痛和颈痛的频率更高,优势比(OR)分别为1.77(95%置信区间[CI]:1.19 - 2.64)和1.92(95%CI:1.22 - 3.02)。作者得出结论,接近已发布标准“行动水平”的振动会导致腰背痛和颈痛。需要保守地评估振动水平并采取控制措施。